Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: JTEM <jtem01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:45:20 -0700
VoiceOfReason <papa_...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perfecting the technology such that it would be superior
to existing weapons is no simple matter. Spear and
atlatls are much simpler to make than a bow and arrow.
And simpler to use, especially the spear.
A bow IS NOT a weapon that just anyone can pick up
and use effectively. There's quite a range in level of
proficiency in gun use, but a gun is a lot easier to use
than a bow. It's one of the reason why projectile weapons
didn't take the forefront of military action until the
introduction of gunpoweder.
I would think that a heavy spear would be a superior
weapon against megafauna.
What is considered "Lethal Velocity" for a Mammoth
anyway?
Bow and arrow would be far superior in one respect -- weight.
Especially for nomads, that's a lot more "killing power" per
pound than spear/atlatl.
Distance. Even a deer -- not normally considered a vicious
animal -- could do a number on you if corned & stabbed to
death.
Then again, it's damn hard to kill a deer with a rifle, if you
don't have a good aim...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- References:
- Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: TomS
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: J.LyonLayden
- Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Bow and Arrow Dating
- Prev by Date: Re: just a moment
- Next by Date: Re: Steven J's failure to recognize what Darwin hath wrought
- Previous by thread: Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- Next by thread: Re: Bow and Arrow Dating
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|