Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins)
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 06:07:39 +1000
UC <uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You wrote that "Recent" was a technical term while "recent" wasn't,
and that the difference was due to capitalization.
The capitalized version happens to be a technical term in geology, and
is therefore capitalized. It's not a technical term because it's
capitalized; It's capitalized because it's a technical term.
And in this, UC is correct.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- References:
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: Harvest Dancer
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- From: UC
- Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Prev by Date: Re: Nominated for Best Insult. Ever. Re: Chez Watt Ballot August 1, 2007
- Next by Date: Re: The Fossil Record
- Previous by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Next by thread: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|