Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: richardalanforrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:58:58 -0700
On 6 Aug, 18:11, spintronic <spintro...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6 Aug, 01:07, Vend <ven...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Aug 5, 11:09 pm, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
Unless you can find a man-made analogy which reproduces itself, and
introduces modifications as part of that process, you can't.
He would be correct if the system uses evolutionary algorithms or
something of that kind to do the adaptation. Probably it doesn't.
Yes it does!
If it does then there is both design and evolution, without any
contraddiction.
Thank You!
If it does not, then his analogy is flawed.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The analogy is not flawed!
So basically it is a computer programme which is designed as a model
of evolutionary theory.
If this all you can come up with it hardly supports your argument,
does it?
RF
.
- References:
- Adaptive learning CPU
- From: spintronic
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: spintronic
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: spintronic
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: richardalanforrest
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: Vend
- Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- From: spintronic
- Adaptive learning CPU
- Prev by Date: Re: Article: business booming at controversial Creatioist museum
- Next by Date: Re: Implausibility that we can be explained by evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- Next by thread: Re: Adaptive learning CPU
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading