Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape

On Aug 6, 6:21 am, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 6, 12:16 am, Harvest Dancer <harvestdan...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Aug 5, 11:33 am, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 5, 1:32 pm, Harvest Dancer <harvestdan...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 23, 12:43 pm, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 23, 1:06 pm, Harvest Dancer <harvestdan...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 23, 9:30 am, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 23, 11:52 am, Augray <aug...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:51:09 -0000, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote in
<uranium-1185202269.070633.208...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :

[snip]

'Recent' is a technical term, you dumb baboon fucking scumbag.

It's not vernacular?

Not 'Recent' with a capital 'R', dumbass.

So if we capitalize the words, they are technical instead of
vernacular?

Archaeopteryx Are Birds. Humans Are Apes.

Nope

Babboons Are Not Apes. Spiders Are Not Insects.

Yes, they are. You're just a fucking moron who cannot even use a
dictionary.

They're All Capitalized You Stupid Fucking Moron Dumbass Which Means
They Are All Technical Terms So Therefore Are All Correct.

You're Just A Fucking Moron Dumbass Who Cannot Even Use A Dictionary.

Jason

Is there something wrong with your central processor?

Since it is your rule that "Bird" is a technical term while "bird"
isn't due to capitalization, then the only problem with my processor
is known as "GIGO".

I never said any such thing.

You wrote that "Recent" was a technical term while "recent" wasn't,
and that the difference was due to capitalization.

Therefore capitalization makes a term a technical term, and while you
would disagree with "men are apes" you cannot disagree with "Men Are
Apes."

Your rules. Sucks to be you.

Jason

.

Quantcast