Re: Does anybody have any evidence that all evolutionary events are

John Wilkins wrote:

Free Lunch <lunch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:44:37 -0700, in talk.origins
"rev.goetz" <jimgoetz316@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<1186274677.314309.95380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

I am wondering if anybody can argue in defense of determinism in
regards to evolutionary history.

I'm sure that Wilkins or any number of others could make the argument,
but that doesn't mean that any accept that it is even worth pursuing.
Determinism makes assumptions as big as an Intelligent Designer and as
unsupported by the evidence.


Jim and I have been having a little backchannel discussion on this. My
basic principle is that every event* has a cause, and so evolution is
determinate (but that doesn't mean it has an outcome that is determinate
in the abstract). In other words, this is the outcome that was
necessary, but there is no way we could know ahead of time that this was
the necessary outcome based on a knowledge of [the best possible]
evolutionary theory. Evolutionary theory constrains outcomes, but not
uniquely.

* I.e., any event within the causal universe. About universes themselves
I have no idea. One might also draw a line at the quantum level. I do
not want to, but physicists tell me I must. Some physicists, anyway.

One could argue that individual quantum events have a major influence on
evolution, and if so then evolution is not determined even in the sense
you state. The question here is whether specific mutations are important
enough to change the course of evolution, or whether there are
sufficient mutations to give selection whatever it needs, insulating
macroscopic events from quantum randomness.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?
    ... Branching evolution is one aspect of evolution that needs to be ... adaptiveness does not need to be part of the definition. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?
    ... allele frequencies in populations over time. ... Branching evolution is one aspect of evolution that needs to be ... adaptiveness does not need to be part of the definition. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What Came Before Monkies?
    ... John Wilkins wrote: ... Jesus loving *anybody* is fari enough, ... "Siding with evolution does not really pose a serious problem ... Neuroscience gears up for duel on the issue of brain versus deity ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Does anybody have any evidence that all evolutionary events are
    ... One might also draw a line at the quantum level. ... evolution, and if so then evolution is not determined even in the sense ... sufficient mutations to give selection whatever it needs, ... But what if there is quantum determinism according to t' Hooft <http:// ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is Sean Pitman a delusional madman?
    ... frequencies in populations over time. ... Branching evolution is one aspect of evolution that needs to be ... adaptiveness does not need to be part of the definition. ...
    (talk.origins)