What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: dkomo <dkomo871@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:12:13 -0600
This was one of the questions I wanted to get answered when I first poked my head into this n.g. a number of years ago. I must say, I have been major big time disappointed. Discussions of evolution have been endless and endlessly repetitive. The received view in biology has been recycled over and over again. Discussions of self-organization in biology have been virtually nil.
Yet, I think there is a way to resolve this question, and the answer IMHO is that self-organization is *way* more important than evolution in producing the phenomenon of life, as can be seen by examining one particular aspect of organisms. What do you think that is?
--dkomo@xxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: Bobby Bryant
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: Raving
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: Ken Shackleton
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: Raving
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: sheldongb
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: r norman
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- From: John Harshman
- Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- Prev by Date: Re: sheep herders, these people that wrote
- Next by Date: Re: New Paradigm on the horizon?
- Previous by thread: Spooky kitty
- Next by thread: Re: What's more important, self-organzation or evolution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|