Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: Seanpit <seanpitnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:53:39 -0700
After a bit of discussion and revision of my initial effort, the
following is my formula for calculating my version of complex
specified information (CSI):
For X = 2:
CSI: X^n - (n! / (n-hd)! hd!)
For X > 2:
CSI: X^n - (( log(base2)(X^n)! / (log(base 2)(X^n) - hd)! * hd!)
X = number of possible characters per position
n = size of the sequence
hd = Hamming Distance
And yes, I have tried it out and it does seem to work quite well
regardless of string size or the number of potential characters per
position. Hopefully no further revisions will be necessary, but
that's why I'm presenting it here to see if anyone can find anything
wrong with the formula.
As it currently stands, the greater the CSI number, the better the
odds of non-random production. This is especially true when compared
to reference sequences with no repeating patterns, like pi, regardless
of the assumed distribution of the origin of the symbols in the test
sequence.
I also want to note, one more time, that the detecting of high CSI, by
itself, does not equal the detection of ET or ID. That sort of
hypothesis requires additional knowledge concerning the material in
which the pattern in carried as well as how this material interacts
with various deliberate and non-deliberate forces of nature.
Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: jenspolsen
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: fropome
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: _Arthur
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: hersheyh
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- From: snex
- Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- Prev by Date: Re: Chez Watt Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Next by Date: Re: An Inflationary Account - #6 - Entropy as missing information
- Previous by thread: Pranking the Creation Museum
- Next by thread: Re: Complex Specified Information - Pitman Formula
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|