Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: "Greg G." <ggwizz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:19:20 -0700
On Jul 20, 6:42 pm, mc...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The earth does not look like as if it had been hot as secular
speculationists propose. Everything looks like it was cold.
The interior is molten. Why wouldn't the outside look cooler after 4.5
billion years?
But did
you know that you can take a piece of granite and melt it? Why, if
that were so granite should look like it's melted state already. But
it does not.
Granite is sedimentary. The sediments were created by erosion with
water. Water is in liquid form long after the earth has cooled.
Interestingly enough every explosion that I have ever seen results in
all the energy being consumed.
No, it's not. Energy is released in an explosion. All the energy is
not released in an explosion unless it is a matter-antimatter
annihilation.
The big bang was supposedly hotter
than the sun. We are told that the element boron is not found in the
sun because it is too hot there.
No, boron would only be found in trace amounts because the sun is too
young and not massive enough to fuse anything but hydrogen into
helium.
The big bang was hotter than the sun
and would have burned up all the boron, It would have burned up all
the gases.
No, the Big Bang would create protons and neutrons. Only quarks would
exist at first, not even protons, which are hydrogen nuclei. As the
universe cooled, the quarks would form protons and neutrons.
The rate that the universe expanded would determine how many would of
these would form atomic nucleus greater than one proton. Some protons
would bind with a neutron or two while some of those would collide and
bind to one another. Those with one proton are hydrogen and those with
two are helium. The helium nuclei require a couple of neutrons to
bind. About 75% of the nuclei were hydrogen and 25% were helium.
They would still be so hot they would be in a plasma state, meaning
the protons and electrons would not form atoms.
Burning implies combining with another element like oxygen, but those
elements were a few billion years in the future.
When the universe had expanded enough which is means the energy was
less dense, it would be cooler and could form atoms with electrons
around the nucleus. Denser spots would have more gravity and draw even
more matter in the form of hydrogen and helium. When there was enough
matter that the gravity created a great enough pressure, the hydrogen
atoms would fuse to make helium and release energy, just as our sun
does. If the star is much larger, it fuses all the hydrogen very
rapidly and starts fusing the helium into larger and larger elements.
Then it explodes and spreads these elements across the galaxy. This is
how heavier elements like boron, oxygen, iron and uranium form.
This stellar debris gets swept up into a solar system where a new star
is forming.
Quite interesting.
This is all fascinating stuff. You would benefit by watching PBS and
The Science Channel instead of televangelists.
JM
--
Greg G.
Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in choosing
between the disastrous and the unpalatable.
--John Kenneth Galbraith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: Danwood224
- Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: Ernest Major
- Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: Frank L
- Re: Hot Big Bang
- From: Robert Carnegie
- Re: Re: Hot Big Bang
- References:
- Hot Big Bang
- From: mccoy
- Hot Big Bang
- Prev by Date: Re: WHY HAVE SOMEONE RATED MY POST AS "BAD"?
- Next by Date: Re: Hot Big Bang
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Hot Big Bang
- Next by thread: Re: Hot Big Bang
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|