Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J. Lodder)
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:00:45 +0200
alwaysaskingquestions <alwaysaskingquestions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Gene Duprés" <Oblio.VonZipper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1184881760.120975.206680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 19, 9:07 am, nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J. Lodder) wrote:
alwaysaskingquestions <alwaysaskingquesti...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As far as I can see, when Darwin first published his ideas, they
weren't
really based on the Scientific Method as it is defined today.
Please enlighten us master, what is:
The Scientific Method as it is defined today?
And while you are at it: Who did the defining?
Jan
The op seems to think it was done in court.
A court that took evidence from a wide range of scientists and outlined
principles which I've seen confirmed here time and time again.
Scientific method isn't determined by majority vote.
And original scientists like Darwin or Einstein
don't follow 'scientific method'. They write it.
Now that you are at it, please enlighten us once more:
What -method- should or could Einstein or Darwin have followed
to arrive at their theories from the data known to them?
And if such a theory-creating method exists,
why didn't many others before them follow it
to arrive at the same theory?
Jan
--
"Anything goes!"
.
- References:
- Darwin and the Scientific Method
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- From: Gene Duprés
- Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- From: alwaysaskingquestions
- Darwin and the Scientific Method
- Prev by Date: Re: Why creationists have better knowledge about freedom
- Next by Date: Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- Previous by thread: Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- Next by thread: Re: Darwin and the Scientific Method
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|