Re: finite thinking

On Jul 12, 6:11 pm, Dale Kelly <THIS_IS_A_SPAMT...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
do you realize that we are not finite beings?

we occupy a distance along a continuum, at least 4 dimensions of
spacetime, all of which are characterized as real number lines

any portion of the real number line, is an infinity in itself, for
instance, there are infinite real numbers between 1 and 2

if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, then how can you argue
that there is not an infinite being, when we are one

I do not see the big leap of faith necessary to believe that some other
being might be a higher cardinality infinity than us, nor the idea that a
supreme being might be the highest cardinality

I do not think these considerations are regularly taken into account

--
Dalehttp://www.vedantasite.org
see website for real email address

Problem: Spacetime is quantized, therefore we do not occupy an
infinite amount of space (nor can we compute things infinitely
precisely or whatever)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: finite thinking
    ... if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, ... I do not see the big leap of faith necessary to believe that some other ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: finite thinking
    ... if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, ... The problem is the Christian God is not a believable entity. ... conscious life for only 500,000 years. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: finite thinking
    ... any portion of the real number line, is an infinity in itself, for ... if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: finite thinking
    ... any portion of the real number line, is an infinity in itself, for ... if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • finite thinking
    ... spacetime, all of which are characterized as real number lines ... if we occupy a certain cardinality of infinity, ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading