Re: In the News: Did Dinosaurs Live with Man?

mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:mccoy-1184094811.589329.306060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Jul 10, 11:48 am, stew dean <stewd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10 Jul, 19:23, m...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Apparently some people still don't know that dinosaur soft tissue
was recently found.

Link?

Don't need a link. It's general knowledge. Naturally evolutionists
aren't familar with knowledge that curtails their belief system.



Or your 'general knowledge' is incorrect, such as in this case.



Other interesting things to note:

Evolutionists were also mistaken at one time or another, in the
past that:

1. Stalactites and stalagmites take millions of years to form. Not
so. Such structures are also found under modern buildings. In the
local fish hatchery museum, in my town, is a picture of bat that
had gotten frozen into a stalactites. So much for evolution myths.

First up this is chemistry/rock formation not evolution and secondly
no one said all such formations take millions of years. Some take
tens of years - it depends on what is forming from what.

Actually you can get field trips to caverns and the tour guide will
spout thousands if not millions of years to wide-eyed youngsters.
I've heard it myself.


As has been mentioned, the length of time it takes to form depends on
the formation, the material in the overlaying rocks, the water flow, the
acidity of the water, the air flow in the cavern, and a number of other
factors.

You seem to believe that because in one instance a process takes a
specific time that all similar processes take the same time. In the case
of caves, the guides will repeat what they are told which in turn is
based on a number of factors, including those I mentioned above. In
other words, what the guides repeat in any given location is correct for
that location and that location only. When, in the majority of cases, a
specific time frame is consistent it is used as a general statement.

Your example recreates none of the conditions found in caves dated as
much older.





2. Fossilization takes thousands if not millions of years to
occur. Note dinosaur soft tissue wasn't fossilized at all.

Again depends. The rock a fossil is found in makes a difference. Do
your homework next time.

I did so. You still believe in evolution, which means you didn't do
your homework.

JM



Stew Dean




The tissue wasn't soft. Don't equivocate.


--
Gary Bohn

Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit a specific interpretation of the
bible.

?Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.? ? Noam Chomsky, 1957

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: In the News: Did Dinosaurs Live with Man?
    ... It's general knowledge. ... So much for evolution myths. ... Actually you can get field trips to caverns and the tour guide will ... I suggest you limit your criticicism of science to waht science says, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: In the News: Did Dinosaurs Live with Man?
    ... It's general knowledge. ... So much for evolution myths. ... The rock a fossil is found in makes a difference. ... your homework next time. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: In the News: Did Dinosaurs Live with Man?
    ... It's general knowledge. ... So much for evolution myths. ... For a fossil to be in rocks that are millions of year old takes ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is evolution accelerating?
    ... >>John Wilkins wrote: ... >>forward-looking in exactly the ways that biological evolution is not. ... >>Would you say that adding the big bang, the formation of elementary ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is evolution accelerating?
    ... >>>how is the evolution of those ideas and techniques not Darwinian? ... >>find this about as useful, in a similar way, as the analogy ... we humans form the ecological backdrop for the evolution of culture. ... Would you say that adding the big bang, the formation of elementary ...
    (talk.origins)