Re: Zoe obviously hasn't done any reading about the Origin of Life or Darwinism
- From: bdbryant@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bobby Bryant)
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:34:24 GMT
In article <vomv831qqlbv4bua2gld7q35uflg54ooni@xxxxxxx>,
wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:10:17 GMT, T Pagano <not.valid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 10:40:34 -0400, Zoe <muze10@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Before picking back up on my study of the laws of intelligence,
There are no such laws as far as we know. \\
so much for 'intelligent design'. if there are no laws regarding
intelligence, how do we ever know ID is valid?
The litmus test is, "Does the argument support my personal religious
beliefs?".
The only theory which attempts to explain the purely naturalistic
emergence of the First Common Ancestory has stagnated for 50 years and
is a failure---Abiogenesis.
and so has a grand unified theory of physics...a failure for 100
years.
so i guess physics is wrong and we can replace it with 'god did it'
except THAT idea has been dead for 2000 years.
Surely only a few hundred.
As an aside not a single atheist anywhere, including the rabid
Dawkins, have successfully argued that an introduction of
supernatural forces, in fact, would require the suspension of any
natural law.
Given how vacuous "goddidit" is, the "theory" of creationism doesn't
require anything at all other than a belief that God did in fact do
it.
--
Bobby Bryant
Reno, Nevada
Remove your hat to reply by e-mail.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: How many Phd's from the clittless death cult post here on T.O.?
- Next by Date: Re: Re: In the News: Wife of 'Dr. Dino' learns sentence today
- Previous by thread: Re: Zoe obviously hasn't done any reading about the Origin of Life or Darwinism
- Next by thread: Re: Zoe obviously hasn't done any reading about the Origin of Life or Darwinism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|