Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- From: sheldongb@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:19:14 -0700
On Jul 5, 8:11 pm, Seanpit <seanpitnos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Jul 5, 5:47 pm, sheldo...@xxxxxxx wrote:Just visualize a hole in a cube, or look at one from your microplan
The degree of irregularity is still the same. At least 30% of the
surface points on one half of the rock must vary in distance from the
center of the rock by more than 10% of the average surface point
distance.
Could this be a big hole in a cube? The surface points would be
nonexistent, or 0, of course. But 100% of the surface points would
vary 100% from the average surface point distance of the rest of the
object.
I'm not sure I am visualizing what you are asking here correctly?
source. Does a hole satisfy the irregularity requirement?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- References:
- Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- From: Seanpit
- Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- From: sheldongb
- Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- From: Seanpit
- Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- Prev by Date: Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- Next by Date: Re: DNA and Information
- Previous by thread: Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- Next by thread: Re: Granite, Symmetry, and ID - Summary
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|