Re: The CSI Challenge of snex

On Jul 5, 6:21 pm, snex <x...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 5, 8:14 pm, sheldo...@xxxxxxx wrote:





On Jul 2, 3:44 pm, snex <s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 2, 5:38 pm, sheldo...@xxxxxxx wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:41 pm, snex <s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 2, 4:08 pm, Seanpit <seanpitnos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Jul 2, 12:52 pm, s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Victor Eijkhout) wrote:

Seanpit <seanpitnos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Signal C:

31415926535897932384626433832795 . . .
You see, Signal C is both complex and specified relative to a pattern
that is very very unlikely to be produced by any natural source of
radiosignals beyond a certain relatively low threshold number of
character positions (i.e., complexity).

Sean, take a square box of side 1 (foot, meter, whatever) and place a
cardboard ring in it that touches the sides. Now start throwing pingpong
balls from a distance so that their location in the box is more or less
random. The ratio between the balls landing in the circle and outside it
will be pi. The more balls you throw, the more digits.

Ok, that's not a radio signal, but it's a very simple physical process,
no intelligence involved.

That's just it. It isn't a radiosignal. Different materials and
methods have different parameters for the investigation of artifact.

If I were an experimental physicist I could
probably come up with a radio equivalent of it.

If the *irregularities* of a radiosignal, as with the dots and dashes
of Morse Code, produced a long series of prime numbers or Pi or
something along these lines, you can bet such a finding would be
recognized by SETI scientists as clear evidence of artifact.

you do realize that every single finite sequence of numbers you can
come up with appears *somewhere* in pi, dont you?

You've got Sean on the run now, Snex. Keep up the good work.

Here's your first single finite sequence to look for. Tell me what
start location this begins with in pi:

101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­01010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­0­1010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­01­010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101­­010101010101010101010

add math to the list of subjects glenn doesnt understand.

What makes you think that, Snex? I provided you a *finite sequence of
numbers*. Is the sequence not a "sequence of numbers", or not finite?

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=0%2C1%2C0%2C1%2C0%2C1%...

what makes me think you do not understand math is that you dont
understand why somebody doesnt actually need to find a sequence in the
digits of pi to know it is there somewhere.

Why, because you said so?

ill give you a chance to
look it up on your own first before embarrassing you. will you take
the chance to learn something? i doubt it

Well here's your chance to show that you know math. Show your work.
I've given you the pi challenge.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The CSI Challenge of snex
    ... The ratio between the balls landing in the circle and outside it ... I provided you a *finite sequence of ... Is the sequence not a "sequence of numbers", ... the chance to learn something? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A Stack of Chessboards
    ... does exactly whatever you claim pure random chance cannot do. ... *simultaneously* whether generated by your fairy or by pure chance. ... evident, often, at the level of structure than sequence). ... all your statistics does is provide 'disproof' of a straw man ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Relationship of Gaps to Thresholds
    ... That is NOT what your math says. ... really meant by his ratio is NOT cytochrome c sequences to total ... from some random sequence until some keystone sequence is reached. ... function-based selection kick in. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... the vase at, or before, noon. ... Do you think that the numbering of the balls is not relevant to ... as long as the sequence of inserting 10 and removing 1 is the same. ... why people think it has anything to do with set theory. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... it's an infinite series of. ... the vase at, or before, noon. ... Do you think that the numbering of the balls is not relevant to ... as long as the sequence of inserting 10 and removing 1 is the same. ...
    (sci.math)