Science Disproves Evolution

Big Bang?

"We know little about that sea. The terms we use to describe its
components, 'dark matter' and 'dark energy,' serve mainly as
expressions of our ignorance." David B. Cline, "The Search for Dark
Matter," Scientific American, Vol. 288, March 2003, p. 52.

"It's clear to most people that you can't be older than your mother.
Astronomers understand this, too, which is why they're so
uncomfortable these days. The oldest stars in globular clusters seem
to date back 15 billion years. The universe appears to be only 9
billion to 12 billion years old. At least one of those conclusions is
wrong." William J. Cook, "How Old Is the Universe?" U.S. News & World
Report, 18-25 August 1997, p. 34.

"I have little hesitation in saying that a sickly pall now hangs over
the big-bang theory. When a pattern of facts becomes set against a
theory, experience shows that the theory rarely recovers." Fred Hoyle,
"The Big Bang Under Attack," Science Digest, May 1984, p. 84.

For decades, big bang theorists said that the amount of mass in the
universe must be enough to prevent all matter from flying apart,
otherwise stars and galaxies could not form. Estimates of the
universe's actual mass always fell far short of that minimum amount.
The "missing mass" is often called "dark matter," because no one could
see it or even detect it. Actually, something had to be "created" to
preserve the big bang theory. The media's constant reference to "dark
matter" enshrined it in public consciousness, much like the supposed
"missing link" between apes and man.

The big bang has struck again. The big bang theory also predicts that
the universe's expansion must be slowing, just as a ball thrown up
must slow as it moves away from the Earth. For decades, cosmologists
have tried to measure this deceleration. The shocking result is now in-
and the answer has been checked and rechecked in many ways. The
universe's expansion is not decelerating; it is accelerating!i To
preserve the theory something must again be invented. Some energy
source that overcomes gravity must continuously push stars and
galaxies away from the center of the universe. This energy, naturally
enough, is called "dark energy."

Neither "dark matter" (created to hold the universe together) nor
"dark energy" (created to push the universe apart) can be seen,
measured, or tested. Each is imagined to preserve the big bang
theory.

Rather than cluttering textbooks and the public's imagination with
statements about things that don't exist, wouldn't it be better to
admit that the big bang is a faulty theory? Of course. But big bang
theorists want to avoid something even worse than damaging their
reputations and careers. If the big bang is discarded, only one
credible explanation remains for the creation of the universe and
everything in it. That thought sends shudders down the spines of many
evolutionists.

Theories for the Evolution of the Solar System and Universe Are
Unscientific and Hopelessly Inadequate.

http://www.creationscience.com/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported
    ... >> Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported ... >> universe after the Big Bang. ... matter was evenly distributed in all ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported
    ... >> Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported ... >> universe after the Big Bang. ... matter was evenly distributed in all ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Origins and Mental Activity
    ... activity before continuing to chew on the laws of intelligence. ... elements formed after the big bang -- except maybe helium and hydrogen ... throughout the universe, and in great quantity. ... will get the furthest in tracking the formation of matter, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
    ... I didn't say the big bang theory must be wrong. ... I have a difficult time with the idea that the universe could happen ... I like to think of a design studio with lots of designers, ... I am also taken by how long the evolution of matter from energy took ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution is really sun worship
    ... Maybe the universe was created in a Big Bang. ... Maybe it's a matter ... > enough to allow the spontaneous generation of matter supposedly allowed ...
    (sci.astro)