Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: Shane <remarcsd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:11:08 +1000
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:43:19 -0700, James Norris wrote:
On Jul 2, 3:20?am, "Boikat" <bull...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"James Norris" <jimnorri...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183338054.588920.291930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 2, 1:37 am, "Boikat" <bull...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"James Norris" <JimNorri...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183334556.781786.303660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 1, 11:57?pm, "Boikat" <bull...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Shane" <remar...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:53:59 -0700, James Norris wrote:
[...]
Admit it, you just went and saw Transformers, didn't you?
I didn't think that was out until some time in July.
Boikat
--
"Krrrrriptonite!"
Lex Luthor
Allow me to make a suggestion - if you haven't got anything to say,
don't say anything. Returning to the topic of the thread:
forWould the words "*** off" register in your mind, or do you need to wait
a translation from the Mother Ship?
<snip>
Boikat
--
"Krrrrriptonite!"
Lex Luthor- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You posted to this thread I just started, so I replied, you got a
problem with that?
And I was replying to the comment about the "Transformer" move, idiot.
But I told you I hadn't seen the movie, so we can move on from there,
surely?
Why?
And you keep removing any material which refers to
the subject under discussion - don't you want to follow, and maybe
even participate in, discussions about topics such as Designed
Consciousness?
I marked my deletion. That's what "<snip>" means, dumbass.
Yes, you removed all the material which refers to the subject under
discussion, marking it with the word 'snip' in angle brackets. It
looks like a weird sort of HTML - is there an equivalent </snip>?
Err no, that would mean end of snip, which would be an opposite, not an
equivalent, Perhaps you meant "corresponding"? however, even if you did
mean that, the answer is still no, but this is Usenet and you can pretty
much do what you like, so feel free ti use it.
If not, then the appropriate remark to you is "***
off from this newsgroup - Do you understand that?".
"Your" thread does not equal "This News Group". Do *you* understand that,
fool?
Yes indeed, your witty and intelligent remark can hardly be faulted in
its veracity. But I am only talking about your contributions to 'my'
thread, so your remark is irrelevant.
Sorry, this is not your thread, it is everybody' on t.o's thread, and
threads often go places their originator never intended.
Otherwise, here's the subject matter of the thread again....
<snip>
Oops! I did it again!
That's OK, no-one minds a genuine mistake
Really? If I accidentally rob your house, instead of your neighbours
house, you won't mind? Can I have your neighbours address please?
<snip>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: James Norris
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- References:
- Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: James Norris
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: Shane
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: Boikat
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: James Norris
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: Boikat
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: James Norris
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: Boikat
- Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- From: James Norris
- Construction of a Conscious Thing
- Prev by Date: Re: Chilean Teens find Whale fossils proving Creationism
- Next by Date: Re: Darwin's acting odd
- Previous by thread: Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- Next by thread: Re: Construction of a Conscious Thing
- Index(es):