Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- From: backspace <sawireless2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:05:50 -0700
On Jun 30, 9:20 pm, Greg Guarino <gdguar...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:44:11 -0700, backspace
<sawireless2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 29, 6:56 pm, hersheyhv <hersh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And a sieve (a dumb unintelligent environment) does not, in your
world, selectively retain items larger than the size of the holes?
That depends on your intent. It could mean that you pantheistically
view a sieve as actually having a mind
No, it categorically could not. Remember this bit: "a dumb
unintelligent environment"?
Dumb, blind, drunk or stupid environment. What is your intent with
these words? You tell me.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- From: Greg Guarino
- Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- From: Kermit
- Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- Prev by Date: Nobody should believe the incredible!
- Next by Date: Re: In the News: Hovind's wife gets a year and a day
- Previous by thread: Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- Next by thread: Re: Survival of the Fittest: What was Darwin's pragmatics?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
