Re: Trees of Life


"Ron O" <rokimoto@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183203066.953173.103560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 30, 6:02 am, "alwaysaskingquestions"
<alwaysaskingquesti...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are two ways we know in which life can develop purely from
non-living
matter - photosynthesis and chemosynthesis.

Photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are not means of life developing.
They are terms used to describe how organisms extract energy from
their environment.


I worded that badly. The point I was trying to make was that they don't need
other pre-existing forms of life for their energy source.

Why then, do we try to construct a tree of life originating back to a
single
point? As organisms using photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are entirely
independent, would it not be more logical to have two separate trees of
life - basically one for plants and one for animals, or do we have real
evidence of a common ancestor? (I'm consciously leaving cyanobacteria out
of
this as I don't think it affects my underlying point.)

Science claims that the evidence indicates life going back to one
point (the lifeform that developed the genetic code that all known
extant life uses), but it is acknowledged that we know nothing about
how many different types of lifeforms may have combined during the
evolution of that common ancestor.

You don't, know much about chemosynthesis and photosynthesis if you
claim that they have to be two separate trees.

That's why I'm asking here :)

Just look up the
bacteria that produce H2S (chemo) and the ones that produce H20
(photo). You will note that they both use the same genetic code and
have similar electron transport systems.

What I'm wondering is whether they inherited the genetic code and electron
transport system from a common ancestor or whether they could have evolved
them separately.

Science doesn't even claim
that it knows what the first lifeforms used as an energy source. My
bet would be on chemosynthesis. Lifeforms probably just took up
molecules from their environment and did things with them. Some of
those chemicals may have been photoactivated, probably not in the
organism, but maybe they were.


A secondary area intrigues me. Outside of those basic organisms that use
photosynthesis or chemosynthesis, all other forms of life grow and
develop
by consuming other organisms - cow eats grass, man eats cow, etc.

What is so intriquing?

Because it seems to me that that organisms starting to consume other
organisms could have been a major stepping stone in evolution.

What is the best source of chemicals in terms
of highest concentrations of the ones needed for life? Why wouldn't
lifeforms evolve to exploit other lifeforms for their energy needs?


Do we have any knowledge of at what point in evolution this process of
organisms consuming organisms began?

Probably as soon as there were enough around to bump into each other.

Ron Okimoto





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trees of Life
    ... It seems to me that the first forms of life, by definition, had to be ... The only way they could get energy was either by photosynthesis ... As far as I can see, chemosynthesis is the more likely of the two as most ... the Theory of Evolution generally assumes that life ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Response to Robert Karl Stonjek on Chemosynthesis
    ... This "appears" to possibly be examples of "chemosynthetic" organisms ... view is chemosynthesis preceded photosynthesis and we would not be ... alive today as an organism had it not been for chemosynthesis although ... PRODUCTION?Dissolution of Silurian-Devonian aquifer in the Lake Huron ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Trees of Life
    ... Photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are not means of life developing. ... They are terms used to describe how organisms extract energy from ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Trees of Life
    ... do we try to construct a tree of life originating back to a single ... As organisms using photosynthesis and chemosynthesis are entirely ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Trees of Life
    ... It seems to me that the first forms of life, by definition, had to be ... As far as I can see, chemosynthesis is the more likely of the two as most ... photosynthesis probably originated in the oceans. ... That is why plants get their own kingdom. ...
    (talk.origins)