Re: Pitman's Miller Time

On Jun 27, 3:21 pm, "Lizzardwoman" <lizzardwomanRM...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

< snip >

I ask what the evidence says.

So do I . . .

You ask how to knock down evidence that doesn't fit your theology. That is
dishonest.

You think you are not religious in your thinking? Don't kid
yourself. You're as biased in your thinking as any hardened sectarian
fundamentalist. If you could show me good evidence for Darwinian-
style evolution, I'd accept it in readily. I have no overwhelming
religious need to avoid evolutionism. In fact, if it actually worked,
I think it would be fabulous - very cool indeed. The problem I have
with Darwinism is that it just doesn't work beyond very low levels of
functional complexity. That's it.

My mind can be changed with evidence. Your mind will not allow any evidence
that counters your preconceived notion that your religious views *must* be
correct. Yes or no?

No. None of my views must be correct at all. They could all be
wrong. That's the nature of human understanding of truth. I'd rather
know the truth than go along with a nice fable. The fact of the
matter is that I really don't see that evolutionism makes any rational
sense. I do in fact think that the majority of scientists have been
duped and that I have it right. Is that arrogant of me? In a way it
is I guess. But, that's the way it is for me. The more I study the
Theory of Evolution, the less it makes sense to me. I used to think
it made a lot of sense about 15 years ago. It doesn't make nearly as
much sense now that I've learned more about it. Sorry.

That's the difference between you and me. I care about intellectual honest.

I'm sure you do. I'm sure you are very honest and sincere in your
beliefs. As it is though you don't know very much about me at all it
seems . . .

By the way, what is your educational background? What do you do for a
living?

sharon

Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com


.