Re: Pitman's Miller Time


"Seanpit" <seanpitnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182925332.044137.186730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Jun 26, 1:41 pm, "Rolf" <r...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > "Seanpit" <seanpitnos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >
| > news:1182866090.880384.254900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Jun
26, 5:17 am, Frank J <f...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >
| > > > So what exactly happened instead of "evolution" in those instances
| > > > that your "math" (or Behe's or Dembski's) suggests otherwise? Do you
| > > > specifically rule out *Darwinian* evolution, or other, e.g.
| > > > Lamarckian?
| >
| > > I believe intelligent design was clearly involved when it comes to the
| > > origin of novel biosystem functions having structural threshold
| > > requirements beyond a thousand specified residues.
| >
| > An interesting theory. Seems that the designer sits back, ready to jump
in
| > and do some advanced, sophisticated genetic engineering whenever he sees
| > that a species needs to exceed the threshold imposed by Sean.
| >
| > But why doesn't he fix the genetic technology to eliminate the
threshold? If
| > I were him, I would have fixed it for good so I could concentrate on
more
| > interesting and rewarding projects. But I suppose his resources are
limited.
|
| I think it was fixed "for good" during the original creation of all
| the various basic kinds of living things and biosystems. After that,
| the no more deliberate tweeking was necessary. No higher-level
| evolution occured or needed to occur.

But WHY do you believe that?

It's because you believe pre-scientific, counterfactual, counter-evidentiary
claims. You have no good reason to believe those things other than your
(likely) childhood inculcation in religion.

It is dishonest to start with a (faulty) conclusion and then try to make the
evidence fit it. Your conclusion, that Bronze and Iron Age folks had some
unique supernatural knowledge, is facially ridiculous.

You are a victim.

sharon

.