Evolution Vs. Creationism Debate Finished

There is no point in debating weather or not evolution is correct. It
is. The book of Genesis has been debunked by science and
astrophysicists have proven that the only way in which the planet
Earth has been create. Biologists have also used genetics, fossils,
and the appearance of vestigial structures in many organisms. How
stupid do you have to be to think a organism named "God" created
humans and all biotic and a-biotic factors.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Discussion of von Rads _Genesis: A Commentary_
    ... I provided this example to show that non-literal readings of Genesis ... began long before evolution came on the scene, ... Can science deflect interest in spiritually beneficial things? ... one interpretation of a claim was faulty; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Question for the Evolutionist
    ... > The alleged evidence of evolution does not support the God hypothesis. ... > Christian evolutionists are deluded buffoons or confused. ... Christians who accept evolution do so because it's good science, ... >> didn't ask their priests and pastors to reconcile Genesis with Sagan's ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Try this
    ... If it weren't science, yes. ... evolution were wrong, half the sciences would be also. ... insights from the book of Genesis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: WingNutDaily columnist asks: Speed of light slowing down?
    ... > billions of years necessary for evolution. ... Even if all our known science regarding the early universe is wrong, ... can never be a scientific validation for Genesis for two reasons. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: What is the purpose of Rayy Martinez posting?
    ... >>> evolution has disproven the existiance of God, ... >>> Science cannot disprove God, and does not attempt to do so. ... offer all of its data as proof that the God of Genesis was not involved ...
    (talk.origins)