Re: Probability formula for life

On Jun 24, 12:33 pm, dkomo <dkomo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If there are 300 billion stars in an average galaxy and 100 billion
galaxies in the observable universe, the total number of stars is 3 X
10^22. Suppose we wanted to know to a certainty of 99.9999% that life
has formed at *least* once on some planet other than earth at one of
these stars. What would be the minimum average probability of life
forming at any of these stars? We can find a simple formula to answer
this question.

Let p_a = the average probability of a star supporting life

P = the probability of at least one other star in the universe
with life

Q = 1-P = the probability of no other stars than
the sun with life

We want to find p_a given P = 0.999999 (a certainty of 99.9999%)

The probability of a star *not* supporting life is

1 - p_a

So the probability of no other stars in the universe supporting life is

(1). (1 - p_a) ^ (N-1) = Q where N = 3 X 10^22

The -1 results because we're excluding our own sun, but N is so large
that N-1 is equal to N for practical purposes.

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides of equation (1), substituting
N for N-1, and dividing through by N we get

(2). ln(1 - p_a) = ln Q / N

Using the power series expansion for ln,

(3). ln(1 - p_a) = -p_a - p_a^2 / 2 - p_a^3 / 3 - ....

Since p_a is small, we can neglect all terms but the -p_a term.

So the final equation is

(4). p_a = -ln Q / N

Now, given P = 0.999999, Q = 1-P = 10^-6

p_a = - ln(10^-6) / (3 X 10^22) = 4.61 X 10^-22

This means that if the average probability that a star in the universe
contains a planet with life is no less than 4.61 X 10^-22, we can be
99.9999% certain that the universe contains *at least* one star (other
than our sun) with life.

Those are pretty good betting odds.

Note that the above analysis ignores *when* life develops at a star.
The analysis is not constrained to extant life. If life developed only
once at some other star 200 million years ago, then disappeared, that is
an example of a successful life event.

And statistics don't lie. The paradox is your being one.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How anthropic is the anthropic principle, exactly?
    ... Isn't it so that our planet is 'earthlike' just because it has life? ... universe is to human life, and even in an anthropic-principal, ID sort ... To evaluate the probability of life as we know it properly you would ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: How anthropic is the anthropic principle, exactly?
    ... Isn't it so that our planet is 'earthlike' just because it has life? ... universe is to human life, and even in an anthropic-principal, ID sort ... It is assigning a probability of life based on ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Opinion Poll: Water and Life?
    ... What is the probability that any given planet or moon has the right ... Suppose we can do experiments to generate life in the lab using a realistic ... the immediate universe where they could occur. ... ha ha ha ha ha ha:) And we should examine other planets and ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Anti-religious
    ... Many of the chemicals for life are found in meteors, ... probability that i'm here right now typing this". ... I wouldn't ay what are the chances of that - since it has already ... And this shows that the universe was created for us. ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away
    ... > Everyone knows if you drive safely the accident rate will go down. ... > resourceful intelligent life is, and just how many planets there are ... the universe, i.e., none. ... reach another star, any more than we can say we will have reached another ...
    (sci.physics)