Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182276572.994897.131760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
snip

Why not take the theistic evolution article, Ray? You seemed to have
such fun with it before. I particularly enjoyed it when you called
Philip Rayment a Darwinist.

He is a Fundamentalist and a quasi-TEist.

Where is you evidence to support this claim, Ray? And what is a
"quasi-TEist"?



I have no time to write the TEist article.

Why not? You really don't expect anyone to believe you actually are
working on your "paper" do you?





As far as the sock puppet comment, I'm
not suggesting that you're a sock puppet, I'm rather admitting that I
am (in fact, I am several sock puppets at CP). It's rather fun to put
in all these seemingly conservative edits which are completely
ridiculous. I would imagine that probably 1/10 CP users are socks of
one form or another.


Why be a SP at CP if the edit is not true? What is the point?

What's the point of your own untrue edits?

snip

It's a meaningless argument.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But Jesus made His claims in the N.T.

Your analogy is admittedly made up.

So is your "arguments".



Most persons think He was not Divine but a "good and wise teacher."
Article says this is impossible unless He was who He says He was.

And Stile4aly showed why this "arguement" was meaningless.

DJT


.