Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182275636.947499.6130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 18, 12:42 pm, Jim Willemin <jim***willemin@hot***mail.com>
wrote:
Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
innews:1182193248.406823.254510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Jun 17, 3:34 pm, Stile4aly <stile4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:17 pm, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Evolution at real time is too slow to observe. Do you know why the
Earth is claimed to be 4.5 billion years in age?

But, of course, here comes some silly punctuated ad hoc reply.

No ad-hoc reply needed. A dozen different isochron dating methods
show that the earth is between about 4.2 and 4.6 billion years old
with the greatest sample cluster around 4.5 billion years.

What external method exists to check accuracy of said dating?

The key word is external.

What would you consider a valid external check?


External: Known age of a material via interlocking historical and
archaeological agreement. Radio dating fails these rare glimpses when
they arise from time to time. Sometimes it succeeds sometimes it
fails. The latter falsifies any notion or assertion that radio dating
IS accurate. I assure you that it is extremely rare for these external
events to occur since both disciplines rarely agree on anything, but
they do occur.


Given that the different isochron dating systems use different elements,
and that each system is therefore independent of the others, each
isochcron
dating method serves as an external check on the others.


Negative. External, in this context, means "nothing to do with radio
dating." How do you establish a beginning bench mark date, that is,
the date from which all others are built upon? The Bible uses
historical and archaeological corroboration from other Near East
nations and star alignments to establish its chronology. The
alignments can only occur once every twenty-six thousand years; the
"procession of the exquinoxes" is a full proof and external method to
establish a benchmark date, which is 2141 BC. In this year Thuban, (or
the Dragon Star) was the North Star and only in 2141 BC did its align
perfectly with the entrance passage way of the Great Pyramid and shine
its light all the way to the bottom. It will take about twenty-six
thousand more years for this to happen again. Since continental drift
has occurred it will be somewhat off at that. Other than that nothing
at all happened in 2141 BC. The important thing is that we have a
objective starting benchmark date to establish Biblical chronology.

Now, how does evolutionary dating schemes establish its beginning
benchmark date, the date all other dates are built upon?


The key word here is independent.

The agreement between independent isochron dates for the age of the
earth
makes it highly unlikely that the results are wildly inaccurate. What
would make you think otherwise?

<snip rest>

Circular reasoning.

And that's what you are an expert at - like the Bible is true, because that
is what the Bible says. Because the Bible sayis ti is true, it is true, but
that is simply the truth and has nothing sith circular reasonign to do.
Truth is truth, and that is the Bible. The Bible is a perfect example of
perfect truth, and that is the truth, so help me God.


But evilutionists, they are atheistisc liarsand do nothing but circular
reasoning, like evolution is true because that's what the evidence shows.
Now that is circular reasoning, because we all know that noe veivence for
evolution exists. That is just a big Darwinian atheistic lie.

You couldn't have said it better yourself, could you? Just ask me whenever
you are overloaded, I knoe all your arguments- you are as predictable as the
pope and I can always lend a helping hand. Know what? I am great at computer
programming, I could easily write a program to write all your postings for
you. Just give the word an I will get cracking. Would be much simpler than
creating a program for poetry. Creationism is tjhe most steriel subject
thinkable, as dry as last years oak leaves.


Outside of all radio dating techniques, how does evolution check the
accuracy of its dating techniques?


Bla bla bla - stupid questions deserve stupid answers.

Ray




.

Relevant Pages

  • Ancient clay has internal clock
    ... A new way of dating archaeological objects has been found, ... Researchers believe they can pinpoint the precise age of materials ... like brick, tile and pottery by calculating how much its weight has ... They have established that their technique can be used to determine ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: If the earth is 6k years old
    ... according to carbon dating. ... much demonstrates the old age of the inorganic elements of the earth. ... and flood evidence were refuted. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob
    ... the Earth is claimed to be 4.5 billion years in age? ... show that the earth is between about 4.2 and 4.6 billion years old ... The latter falsifies any notion or assertion that radio dating ... nations and star alignments to establish its chronology. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • POTM Nomination: Was Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob
    ... the Earth is claimed to be 4.5 billion years in age? ... show that the earth is between about 4.2 and 4.6 billion years old ... The latter falsifies any notion or assertion that radio dating ... nations and star alignments to establish its chronology. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: POTM Nomination: Was Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob
    ... the Earth is claimed to be 4.5 billion years in age? ... show that the earth is between about 4.2 and 4.6 billion years old ... The latter falsifies any notion or assertion that radio dating ... nations and star alignments to establish its chronology. ...
    (talk.origins)