Re: What does Bulcher and Ham have in common?

On Jun 12, 6:39 pm, "Dana Tweedy" <reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ray Martinez" <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1181693357.098549.292700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





On Jun 12, 2:15 pm, "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD9...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
þus cwæð Ray Martinez:

SNIP....

I understand perfectly, kemo sabe. Talking of specifics, I do hope that
your
forthcoming and eagerly-awaited paper, will, as part of your recently
announced conversion to anti-microevolutionism, refute, in detail, each
and
every example of speciation that has been observed and documented both in
the wild and under experimental conditions? I asked this once before, but
recieved no reply. I can post a list of same, if you like, so that you
can
make a start on it. Because unless you can explain each and every one of
those events, your attempt to disprove microevolution is doomed to
failure.

This makes you and Ken Ham on the same side.

How so? Ham is one of yours....


Ham accepts microevolution, just like you do. I know for a fact that
microevolution is false, there is no evidence for the claim.





Bulcher and Ham agree on evolution, nice couple.

Ray, do you even have a clue as to what you are claiming?


Dana, Bulcher and Ken Ham, what do they these Fundamentalists have in
common?

Answer: they all believe in microevolution?


DJT- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

Ray



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re: What does Bulcher and Ham have in common?
    ... announced conversion to anti-microevolutionism, refute, in detail, each ... every example of speciation that has been observed and documented both in ... Ham accepts microevolution, just like you do. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What does Bulcher and Ham have in common?
    ... Ham accepts microevolution, just like you do. ... Oh, dear, Ray breaks his word yet again, and replies to me! ... Well, let's see, "Tiny" and myself are not fundamentalists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Bible, Evolution, TEism: Ray v. the Mob
    ... In message, Ray Martinez writes ... >>> Ham accepts microevolution, just like you do. ... >>> microevolution is false, there is no evidence for the claim. ... don't you see that what you have done by "simply accepting" you have ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Defining&testing "macroevolution" (was: Testing the Laws of Intelligence)
    ... evolution of populations below the level of speciation. ... It means that changes within a population or within one species is ... called "microevolution", as opposed to the origin of new species and ... Bacteria don't reproduce sexually, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Defining&testing "macroevolution" (was: Testing the Laws of Intelligence)
    ... having to do with microevolution, in other words having to do with ... evolution of populations below the level of speciation. ... populations of what was formerly a single species, ... Bacteria don't reproduce sexually, ...
    (talk.origins)
Quantcast