Re: What does Bulcher and Ham have in common?


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1181693357.098549.292700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 12, 2:15 pm, "Tiny Bulcher" <RSGD9...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
þus cwæð Ray Martinez:

SNIP....

I understand perfectly, kemo sabe. Talking of specifics, I do hope that
your
forthcoming and eagerly-awaited paper, will, as part of your recently
announced conversion to anti-microevolutionism, refute, in detail, each
and
every example of speciation that has been observed and documented both in
the wild and under experimental conditions? I asked this once before, but
recieved no reply. I can post a list of same, if you like, so that you
can
make a start on it. Because unless you can explain each and every one of
those events, your attempt to disprove microevolution is doomed to
failure.

This makes you and Ken Ham on the same side.

How so? Ham is one of yours....


Bulcher and Ham agree on evolution, nice couple.

Ray, do you even have a clue as to what you are claiming?

DJT


.

Quantcast