Re: Is the black race/culture under evolved (NON RACIST THREAD)?

On Jun 11, 9:54 am, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
jgris...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 10, 8:36 pm, Artificer <eliezerfigue...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As far as I know there are not "black" highly developed countries. I
mean countries like the USA, Japan or Europe but where the primary
race is black. Somebody told that this is prove that white and yellow
races are far more evolved.

My personal opinion is that the reason for these phenomena is more
historical than evolution related.

Anybody could please contribute with NON RACIST information in favor
or against this theory. I really will like to make an intelligent
discussion out of this!

Clearly, the adaptation of darker skin pigment and the adaptation of
the eyelid against glare are significant evolutionary advancements in
human biology. These are the qualities of a more evolved human than
the Asian and White "races". But, as a consequence of being better
adapted to their environment, Blacks don't have the same needs for
clothing to protect their skin from the sun or hats to protect their
eyes from glare, so no significant need to originate a textile
industry. Asians and whites have adapted their cultures to deal with
their biological shortcomings and having found ways to overcome their
shortcomings, they have learned to be inventive in many other ways.
Africans are better adapted to the environment, therefore the need to
be inventive is greatly reduced. Biological evolution is not equal to
industrial developement.

Nobody can fit more errors into a single paragraph than Grisham.

Dark skin has evolved many times in human populations and so has light
skin, in response to particular environments. Dark skin works better in
the tropics, light away from the tropics. Both are selected in their own
environments and neither can be said to be more "advanced". If we all
accept that we came from Africa, then it's probably that dark skin was
the original human condition.
SNIP...


Imagine that; a man with a degree in evolutionary biology hiding
behind "science" and saying that human beings began in Africa after
evolving from a quasi Stone Age hybrid ape-man freak.

This is your racist brain on evolution.

John Harshman is a racist promoting human evolution to somehow be
science. The depths the Atheist must go to account for the origins of
mankind: human evolution based on racism (just like Darwin).

Why do evolutionists get a free ride?

The media are Darwinists.

Collectively, the effects of the invisble Devil is the only
explanation that accounts for human evolution to not be branded for
what it is: racism and Atheist nonsense.

Ray




.

Relevant Pages