Re: Common ancestor between man and ape

In article <uranium-1179348135.558869.305690
@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx says...
On May 16, 10:56 am, Cemtech <c...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <uranium-1179321859.685232.91650
@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx says...



On May 15, 8:58 pm, Cemtech <c...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <uranium-1179262011.653235.318480
@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx says...

On May 15, 4:19 pm, Augray <aug...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 May 2007 12:49:24 -0700, UC <uraniumcommit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
in <uranium-1179258564.320783.104...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :

On May 15, 12:54 pm, richardalanforr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

[snip]

So what? Why does man's taxomonic status bother you so much.

It doesn't bother me in the slightest. I'm just persnickety about
language, which so many biologists, being Mongoloid idiots, are
incapable of.

Actually, the problem is that you're simply argumentative, as the
2700+ postings of the "KT boundry event" thread from last year so
aptly demonstrate. You don't give a hoot about language.

Oh yes I do....

We are no more 'apes' than we are cabbages...our ancestors and apes'
ancestors were at one time the same population, but that DOES NOT make
us apes...because our ancestors and cabbage's ancestors were once one
population...we are no longer cabbages, and we are no longer
apes....we are HUMANS!!!!

Yes we are humans.......which is part of the ape grouping.

That does not make us 'apes' when the word 'human' is avaialable and
more specific.

We are humans which is part of the ape family, Hominidae, which is part
of the order, Primates, which is part of the class, Mammalia, which is
part of the phylum, Chordata, which is part of the kingdom, Animalia,
which is part of the entity, life on earth.

So what planet are you from?

Incorrect:

Here's what you need to say:

"Homo are part of the family Hominidae, which is part of the order,
Primates, which is part of the class, Mammalia, which is part of the
phylum, Chordata, which is part of the kingdom, Animalia..."

"Apes are the members of the Hominoidea superfamily of primates, which
includes humans."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apes

--
Steve "Chris" Price
Associate Professor of Computational Aesthetics
Amish Chair of Electrical Engineering
University of Ediacara "A fine tradition since 530,000,000 BC"

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
    ... You don't give a hoot about language. ... ancestors were at one time the same population, ... part of the phylum, Chordata, which is part of the kingdom, Animalia, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
    ... language, which so many biologists, being Mongoloid idiots, are ... You don't give a hoot about language. ... ancestors were at one time the same population, ... part of the phylum, Chordata, which is part of the kingdom, Animalia, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
    ... You don't give a hoot about language. ... DOES NOT make us apes...because our ancestors and cabbage's ... usage *comes* from scientific usage into popular usage. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
    ... You don't give a hoot about language. ... ancestors were at one time the same population, ... population...we are no longer cabbages, ... We are humans which is part of the ape family, Hominidae, which is part ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: new book on the spread of IE
    ... along with my model of language evolvement in Eurasia. ... Jordan valley and in Anatolia at the same time. ... Proto-Indo-European, ... Maybe that's because primates didn't evolve out of humans (or vice ...
    (sci.lang)