Re: Core beliefs
- From: snex <xens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 May 2007 12:18:19 -0700
On May 13, 1:40 pm, "Craig Franck" <craig.fra...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"snex" wrote
Zoe <muz...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I guess the real point of contact has to be WHY we have the core
beliefs that we have, and can they be justified.
I think I can justify my core belief. Can the evolutionist or the
theistic evolutionist justify his/her core belief?
you are only half right. creationists do have a core belief in which
they interpret all facts. scientists simply draw logical inferences
from the facts themselves. there is no core belief that scientists
adhere too when looking at facts. scientists only draw conclusions
that the facts themselves warrant.
This is bordering on propaganda.
There are clearly a number of selection effects such as
wanting to prove your own theory correct, be socially
accepted by relevant peers, and any number of other
biases present in prioritizing and funding projects.
In the development of new drugs, it's built right into the
methodology that scientists can't be impartial.
and there are equally many scientists trying to *disprove* each other.
everybody is kept honest by this.
it just so happens that no facts
warrant the conclusion that any gods exist. too bad for gods.
Scientists can't agree on whether Pluto is a planet or not,
but they can be completely rational as to whether or not
god[s] exist. Okay. . .
you idiot, scientists are not in disagreement over pluto's physical
properties, just over the definition of "planet."
--
Craig Franck
craig.fra...@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cortland, NY
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Core beliefs
- From: Craig Franck
- Re: Core beliefs
- References:
- Core beliefs
- From: Zoe
- Re: Core beliefs
- From: snex
- Re: Core beliefs
- From: Craig Franck
- Core beliefs
- Prev by Date: Re: Common ancestor between man and ape
- Next by Date: Re: Core beliefs
- Previous by thread: Re: Core beliefs
- Next by thread: Re: Core beliefs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|