Re: Re: Science Disproves Evolution



On 10 May 2007 21:39:30 -0700, abiele7000@xxxxxxx enriched this group
when s/he wrote:

On May 10, 3:27 pm, hbarwood <hbarw...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]

Perhaps I can offer an update.

You are welcome to try. However, you would first need to understand
the subject so you could know what is worth cutting and pasting.

The Big Bang Theory is a purely mathematical abstract construct with
very little or no basis in reality,

Rubbish.

except that the universe is
expanding and that the expansion appears to be accelerating.

Only appears, there is still a lot of debate on that subject and it
may be years before we know for sure. However, the BB theory has
nothing whatsoever to do with the current observation that expansion
/may/ be taking off again.

The math
was invented by materialists in an effort to explain the observation
of our expanding universe and the known helium and deuterium
abundances found in the universe.

The BBT offers answers to a lot more than that.

The math is constantly being tweaked
in an effort to explain the big bang as well as the formation of
galaxies, stars, planets etc.

All good science gets adjusted as new data comes along.

As with biogeny, cosmogony has become
permeated with evolutionary assumptions and conclusions, yet, despite
this, the Big Bang points to an extremely fined tuned low entropic
beginning of our universe that suggest an uncaused cause, that must
exist, that caused the universe to come into existence, and many have
concluded the uncaused cause to be an intelligent being, the I AM, God
Himself.

Total absolute RUBBISH. It points to no cause because it does not need
a cause.

Whenever problems arise, a big banger will just add some more
mathematics to the equation, thus we have this mysterious mathematical
'inflation' to help bring the Big Bang theory into agreement with
theoretical observations. If there was ?inflation? at all, then we do
not know what started the inflation and what caused the inflation to
suddenly stop.

Inflation explains a lot, but you would need to understand what you
are talking about in order to get the ideas involved.

Mathematical changes also resulted from the "Big Bangers" failure to
find the predicted gravitons, monopoles, etc. Using their preconceived
materialistic worldview as a constraint, and their intelligence, big
bangers simply devised more mathematics to explain away their failure
to observe the predictions of the Big bang, and now the "Big Bangers"
have new mathematical reasons why we do not observe the predicted
gravitons, monopoles, etc. If they had found the predicted gravitons
and monopoles in the first place, they would not have bothered to add
the new math that makes them invisible.

The graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle, it has never been
observed. It may, if it exists, mediate the force of gravity in the
framework of quantum field theory. If it exists, and scientists only
claim it exists because every other force in the in the universe has a
carrier particle, it must be massless because we know that
gravitational force has unlimited range.

Other problems with the Big Bang:


[snip more crap from someone who clearly doesn't understand the
subject.]

I'm not going through 800+ lines to correct all the many mistakes. If
you have any one question that you want answered post a short message
and I will try and put you on the right track.

--
Bob.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Science Disproves Evolution
    ... nobel prize for DISCOVERING the background radiation? ... the Big Bang points to an extremely fined tuned low entropic ... mathematics to the equation, thus we have this mysterious mathematical ... creationists keep saying supernaturalism is NEW idea when it's ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: "instant" of the Big-Bang
    ... Princeton University Press. ... If there is an instant, at a "big bang," when our universe started ... started out as a quantum field (the false vacuum) that experienced a ... what I mean by you really need mathematics? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Talk about "Fucking the Troops Around"
    ... Tell me - the theory of the Big Bang tells us that the universe was created out of nothing. ... The Big Bang relies on the idea that we can see where the ENDS of the universe are and hence we can calculate the amount of time the universe has been here. ... And, say, why is it that the mathematics of nuclear fusion tell us that there is NO favoritism between forming protons and antiprotons, electrons or positrons. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Checkmate, Atheists!
    ... of the Big Bang are even written let alone understanding anything about ... a problem with the Big Bang. ... I didn't say anything about beliefs in God. ... the mathematics of the Big Bang as if you understood it, ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Checkmate, Atheists!
    ... of the Big Bang are even written let alone understanding anything ... a problem with the Big Bang. ... Bang but not some other nutjob's belief in God. ... the mathematics of the Big Bang as if you understood it, ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)