Re: [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- From: "Rolf" <rolf@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:18:31 +0200
"Josh Miles" <no@xxxxxxxxxx> skrev i melding
news:HICdnT6du90UfqjbnZ2dnUVZ_r7inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bobby Bryant wrote:Yes, I guess so. It looked like a free subscription, and it seems prudent to
In article <59lnreF2lmu1oU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Rolf" <rolf@xxxxxxxx> writes:
The option of posting to T.O. is being removed from the service at
my ISP from time to time, and it takes months of repeated complaints
before it is restored. (Sabotage?)
I am very satsified with News.Universal.NET, except it is not
free. Is Usenet good enough?
Usenet is "where" all these posts are. News.Universal.NET, Google
groups, WebTV, etc. are merely ways of ways of fetching and posting
them.
I think he might mean Usenet.com: http://usenet.com/
be sceptical about free offers.
As a french teacher once said - Beware of the girls who do it for nothing.
.
- References:
- [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- From: Rolf
- Re: [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- From: Bobby Bryant
- Re: [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- From: Josh Miles
- [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- Prev by Date: Re: The testimony of the stars: The universe is old!
- Next by Date: Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Usenet OK to use?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
