Re: corruption of science
- From: wf3h <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Apr 2007 19:36:39 -0700
verulam wrote:
The advantages of that reconstruction are, in part, that it is much
more coherent with the rest of science and in part that it seems to be
more consistent with observations about humans. In particular, it
leads to theories of humor and sexuality which, I feel, work better
than anything in the scientific literature.
earthworms don't have humor. nor do plants. nor do bacteria
IOW your 'theory' doesn't fit about 99.99999% of life on earth
and you say it's MORE useful than evolution??
.
- References:
- corruption of science
- From: Dale Kelly
- Re: corruption of science
- From: verulam
- Re: corruption of science
- From: Shane
- corruption of science
- Prev by Date: Re: Taliban before the Taliban
- Next by Date: Re: Scientific Models Are Usually Wrong Though Helpful
- Previous by thread: Re: corruption of science
- Next by thread: Re: corruption of science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|