Re: Re: what is science and what is NOT science
- From: Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:50:56 GMT
On 20 Apr 2007 08:58:17 -0700, Throwback <throwback8@xxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:
On Apr 20, 10:56 am, ayers...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 20, 10:01 am, Throwback <throwba...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 19, 10:03 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007 11:02:48 -0700, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by Throwback <throwba...@xxxxxxxxx>:
<snip>
Wait! The scientists were frustrated, as they couldn't put what they
observed into an evolutionary context (meaning the atheistic
philosophy
of darwin's cult of pseudoscience).
I think I've detected your basic problem. You think all
scientists are atheists, which is incorrect, but that's not
your basic problem.
Strawman. I never said that.
You think all those who accept the
overwhelming evidence supporting the ToE are atheists, which
is also incorrect, but that's not your basic problem either.
Strawman. I never thought that. But it appears you believe
you possess psychic powers, as to be able to read my
mind.
Those two are merely the result of your basic problem, which
is that you've been brainwashed since birth by "Christian"
fundamentalists and other assorted Biblical literalists, and
are therefore unable to think; all you can do is regurgitate
fundamentalist propaganda.
No, but what you need to do is stick your conjectural,
speculative evolutionary lines of descent up your
collective pseudoscientific fannies.
And they should put a caption in all the textbooks
where they are teaching these young impressionable
kids these lines of descent that reads as follows:
"These evolutionary lines of descent are speculative
conjecture, and not undisputed scientific fact.
And then we can focus on teaching something a
little more patriotic in school, like:
I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the united states
of america, and to the republic, for which it stands,
one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice
for all.
Most scientists are not atheists, what they are is, afraid to tell the
truth, because aclu will step in, and then they get fired. they whant
to retire and move on. They know the truth, but are afraid to make
waves. Science knows that evolution has nothing new for the last 150
years, because it's a lie.
Like a cult, anything outside of the orthordox views
will be looked upon reprovingly ...
No, science welcomes new ideas and views - even ones that threaten to
overturn longstanding theories. But they have to be scientific,
religious mumbo-jumbo doesn't wash.
--
Bob.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Creationist: Teaching 'evolution-only' dampens respect for human life
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Condolences to VA Tech
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: what is science and what is NOT science
- Next by thread: Re: what is science and what is NOT science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
