Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: David Iain Greig <dgreig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC)
someone2 <glenn.spigel2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19 Apr, 17:22, David Iain Greig <dgr...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greg G. <ggw...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 19, 6:37 am, someone2 <glenn.spig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the site is anyway suggesting that we are simply a biological
mechanism that has evolved, and follows the known laws of physics,
then I would challenge you to an open debate on the subject. If it is
not suggesting such a thing, then for clarities sake, should you not
make it clear, as otherwise it might give the wrong impression.
The home page athttp://www.talkorigins.orgsays:
Talk.origins is a Usenet newsgroup devoted to the discussion
and debate of biological and physical origins. Most
discussions in the newsgroup center on the
creation/evolution controversy, but other topics of
discussion include the origin of life, geology, biology,
catastrophism, cosmology and theology.
The TalkOrigins Archive is a collection of articles and
essays, most of which have appeared in talk.origins at one
time or another. The primary reason for this archive's
existence is to provide mainstream scientific responses to
the many frequently asked questions (FAQs) that appear in
the talk.origins newsgroup and the frequently rebutted
assertions of those advocating intelligent design or other
creationist pseudosciences.
What is unclear about that?
Technically *I* wrote the 'talk.origins website'. The Archive,
on the other hand, I maintain an arms length plausible deniability
sort of thing around.
http://www.ediacara.org/~to
--D.>
Would you be willing to openly enter a debate on this newsgroup into
the plausibility of us (humans) simply being a biological mechanism
that evolved through the propagation of beneficial mutations?
Well, first of all, the USENET newsgroup talk.origins is what I am
responsible for, which you persist in confusing with the Archive. I
thought I was clear; I am not involved in running the Archive.
Secondly, we've been discussing human evolution for decades on this
newsgroup. what makes you special?
--D.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: someone2
- Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- References:
- To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: someone2
- Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: Greg G.
- Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: David Iain Greig
- Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- From: someone2
- To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- Prev by Date: Re: From soc.history.what-if A World Without Grass
- Next by Date: Re: Galileo - Take 2 [Fantastically LONG]
- Previous by thread: Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- Next by thread: Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website
- Index(es):