Re: To the writers of the Talk.Origins website

On Apr 19, 9:47 pm, someone2 <glenn.spig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 19 Apr, 12:44, Sonofagunzel <soas...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Apr 19, 9:37 pm, someone2 <glenn.spig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 19 Apr, 12:27, Sonofagunzel <soas...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Apr 19, 8:37 pm, someone2 <glenn.spig...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If the site is anyway suggesting that we are simply a biological
mechanism that has evolved, and follows the known laws of physics,
then I would challenge you to an open debate on the subject. If it is
not suggesting such a thing, then for clarities sake, should you not
make it clear, as otherwise it might give the wrong impression.

How do humans violate the laws of physics?

You are not a writer for talk.origins, you are starting to behave more
like a stalker, haven't you got something better to do?

That's the first sensible post I've ever read from you.

Doesn't your behaviour being likened to that of a stalker, and you
thinking that is sensible ring any alarm bells for you?

As a matter of fact it does.

.

Loading