Re: "a question of where you put Grandma"

On Apr 12, 9:17 pm, "JTEM" <jte...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ken Shackleton" <ken.shackle...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Had hair" would be a conclusion. "Didn't have hair"
would be a conclusion. I have frequently argued against
conclusions.

Yes...you simply argue against the conclusions of
others....

Oops, there's that slipped-brain of yours again. The
point, my fine feathered friend, is to separate fact
from conjecture, objective science from subjective
views.

You wouldn't understand. Well, you never have in the past...

Let's list some of your non-subjective views then:

1. The DNA-centric view is wrong...apparently meaning that DNA
evidence cannot be trusted.
2. It would be impossible for Archaeopteryx to climb a tree.
3. You never state conclusions, just facts.

Anyone else care to chime in?

.