Re: "a question of where you put Grandma"



"Ken Shackleton" <ken.shackle...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"Had hair" would be a conclusion. "Didn't have hair"
would be a conclusion. I have frequently argued against
conclusions.

Yes...you simply argue against the conclusions of
others....

Oops, there's that slipped-brain of yours again. The
point, my fine feathered friend, is to separate fact
from conjecture, objective science from subjective
views.

You wouldn't understand. Well, you never have in the past...


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: unnatural languages
    ... Or anywhere else in the world, for example in the English language. ... Oops, sorry to argue on the PTD level. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: We want YOU...to kick the habit!!!
    ... Congrats and welcome to AS3, ... "Argue for your limitations and sure enough, ... Oops! ...
    (alt.support.stop-smoking)
  • Re: Sore mo ii desu, ne.
    ... , need to use nagative form of ... sentense. ... you have been trying to argue. ... Oops! ...
    (sci.lang.japan)