Re: Re: Mr. MacRae owes an apology to all

On 11 Apr 2007 07:37:50 -0700, "Lin Liangtai" <lin440315@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
enriched this group when s/he wrote:

On 4¤ë9¤é, ¤W¤È8®É34¤À, rwal...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 8, 4:28 am, "LinLiangtai" <lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

snip



How many fossil cells have you ever seen
through a microscope? I don't think you
are qualified to talk about fossils.

You just don't think, period. That's the problem. Clearly you've
learned nothing from all that time you allegedly spent looking through
microscopes. By the way, hundreds of hours is nothing. Stop making a
fool of yourself.

Are they fossils? Yes, or no, please.

No.

--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mr. MacRae owes an apology to all
    ... through a microscope? ... are qualified to talk about fossils. ... fool of yourself. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Bipedalism in different substrates
    ... >zebra fossils around a water hole at the edge of a forest or spider monkey ... actually WETTER than typical hominids ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: How Evolution flunks the Science test.
    ... 100,000 genes, each one of which is able to affect in some way the size, ... it implies that multiple populations of fish were developing into amphibians whereas in reality only one population would have done so. ... the old creationist lie that there are no transitional fossils. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Notes on an Answers in Genesis seminar.
    ... Philip also mentioned that new ... Actually, new fossils *have* been found, or at least revealed to the ... also said that Nature had accepted a paper on Archaeoraptor, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: To John Harshman -- re Isochrons
    ... Why does a molten core act like a solid? ... How are fossils dated? ... If the age of rocks are not times since solidification but a view ... I addressed this in my previous post, and your response was to snip ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading