Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?

"On 31 Mar 2007 09:41:28 -0700, in article
<1175359288.726554.179840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Apobetics stated..."

Ancestor More Ape-like?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17873752/

It appears that the evolutionists have their ancestry right. This
skull was reconstructed to look more man like due to the religious
bias of the reconstructor (a naked ape himself).

Over and over again we see the goo to you by way of the zoo naked apes
cheating in their dishonest "scientism". Add to this one the Piltdown
man, Nebraska man, Java man, Peking man, and Neanderthal. All of
which have been proven fakes and presented by these naked apes who
pretend to be real men.

I've seen this list so often - I just wonder whether anybody who
recites it has the least idea what these are -

Can you, Apobetics, tell us anything at all about Piltdown,
Nebraska, Java, Peking, Neanderthal?

Anything?

Or are you just copying this list from somebody else?

And can you tell us any reason at all to think that each of
these is a "proven fake"?

(Yes, I know that *one* of those is a proven fake. I'd just
like to see whether Apobetics can distinguish between a
proven fake, a rapidly corrected mistake, something lost
in the middle of a major war, and an amply studied type
with many exemplars. I wonder whether A. even knows
enough to tell us the story of the one which was a fake.)


The coin of the realm for evolutionism religion is lies, deceit,
fakery, and deception. Add to that censorship of any an all who
question this stupidity.

Who ya gonna believe in this bunch?



--
---Tom S.
"...when men have a real explanation they explain it, eagerly and copiously and
in common speech, as Huxley freely gave it when he thought he had it."
GK Chesterton, Doubts About Darwinism (1920)

.