Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil

On Mar 19, 10:18 am, "Robert Carnegie" <rja.carne...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mar 18, 5:33 pm, "chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx"



<chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:44 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 18 Mar 2007 08:24:23 -0700, "Lin Liangtai"

<lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A Carboniferous fossil found in Pennsylvania
shows round red blood cells over 10 micrometer in diamter, as well as
bone cells. They should be human red blood cells, because non-mammals
do not have "round", "nucleus-less" red blood vessels while no other
mammals have such large red blood cells.
These red blood cells are shown at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=3&page=1

Ed, you're a nut.

--http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water

That's not Ed. It is, however, a nut.

Are you sure it isn't Ed? It's hard to believe that he'd send an
evangelist into t.o instead of coming himself. In fact, it's hard to
understand why he or his hypothetical school would come to t.o at
all. He is known here of old.

There are a lot of people in the world. It's not surprising that any
nut posting on the 'net can find one other nut to follow him.

I believe someone posted host data that showed them in significantlt
different parts of the world.

Chris

.

Relevant Pages