Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: "Robert Carnegie" <rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2007 07:18:11 -0700
On Mar 18, 5:33 pm, "chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx"
<chris.linthomp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:44 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 08:24:23 -0700, "Lin Liangtai"
<lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A Carboniferous fossil found in Pennsylvania
shows round red blood cells over 10 micrometer in diamter, as well as
bone cells. They should be human red blood cells, because non-mammals
do not have "round", "nucleus-less" red blood vessels while no other
mammals have such large red blood cells.
These red blood cells are shown at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=3&page=1
Ed, you're a nut.
--http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
That's not Ed. It is, however, a nut.
Are you sure it isn't Ed? It's hard to believe that he'd send an
evangelist into t.o instead of coming himself. In fact, it's hard to
understand why he or his hypothetical school would come to t.o at
all. He is known here of old.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- References:
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Desertphile
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Prev by Date: Re: John Harshman is going to get me
- Next by Date: Re: John Harshman is going to get me
- Previous by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Next by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|