Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Richard Clayton <pockZIGetnZIGerd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:17:57 GMT
chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:44 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 18 Mar 2007 08:24:23 -0700, "Lin Liangtai"
<lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:A Carboniferous fossil found in PennsylvaniaEd, you're a nut.
shows round red blood cells over 10 micrometer in diamter, as well as
bone cells. They should be human red blood cells, because non-mammals
do not have "round", "nucleus-less" red blood vessels while no other
mammals have such large red blood cells.
These red blood cells are shown at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=3&page=1
--http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
That's not Ed. It is, however, a nut.
I'm not surprised. Even Sollog apparently has at least one True Believer.
--
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Richard Clayton
"Remember, always be yourself. Unless you suck." — Joss Whedon
.
- References:
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Desertphile
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Prev by Date: Re: models of the universe
- Next by Date: Re: Cultist Hovind: Another cultist in the inbound email
- Previous by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Next by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|