Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: "chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx" <chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Mar 2007 10:33:29 -0700
On Mar 18, 1:44 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 08:24:23 -0700, "Lin Liangtai"
<lin440...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A Carboniferous fossil found in Pennsylvania
shows round red blood cells over 10 micrometer in diamter, as well as
bone cells. They should be human red blood cells, because non-mammals
do not have "round", "nucleus-less" red blood vessels while no other
mammals have such large red blood cells.
These red blood cells are shown at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=3&page=1
Ed, you're a nut.
--http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
That's not Ed. It is, however, a nut.
Chris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Desertphile
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Robert Carnegie
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Richard Clayton
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- References:
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- From: Desertphile
- Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Prev by Date: Re: Why Should Evolution be Taught as Science in Schools?
- Next by Date: Re: Chapter 3 - The voyage of ....death
- Previous by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Next by thread: Re: Human red blood cells found in Carboniferous fossil
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|