Re: consciousness

Dick <remdickhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:27:25 +1000, j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John
Wilkins) wrote:

Dale Kelly <dale.kelly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:57:06 +1000, John Wilkins wrote:

It's a process of processing


your premise is your conclusion

Not in this case. It's a matter of realisng that there are processes of
processes (like there are rates of change in rates of change). This is
not circularity but metalogic.

And with what did you "choose" to believe your "metalogic"?

Umm, could you rephrase the question?
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."

.

Quantcast