Re: consciousness
- From: Dick <remdickhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:21:50 -0600
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:27:25 +1000, j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John
Wilkins) wrote:
Dale Kelly <dale.kelly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:57:06 +1000, John Wilkins wrote:
It's a process of processing
your premise is your conclusion
Not in this case. It's a matter of realisng that there are processes of
processes (like there are rates of change in rates of change). This is
not circularity but metalogic.
And with what did you "choose" to believe your "metalogic"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: consciousness
- From: Bob Casanova
- Re: consciousness
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: consciousness
- References:
- consciousness
- From: Dale Kelly
- Re: consciousness
- From: Greg G.
- Re: consciousness
- From: Dale Kelly
- Re: consciousness
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: consciousness
- From: Dale Kelly
- Re: consciousness
- From: John Wilkins
- consciousness
- Prev by Date: Re: Cold Blooded Dinosaurs
- Next by Date: Re: consciousness
- Previous by thread: Re: consciousness
- Next by thread: Re: consciousness
- Index(es):