Re: Has he published it yet?

On 6 Mar 2007 10:34:57 -0800, "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Mar 5, 9:50 pm, "A.Carlson" <amca...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:10:44 -0500, "Dana Tweedy"

<reddfr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Ray Martinez" <pyramid...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
The
map is endorsed by many credentialed persons including Einstein.

as has been pointed out already, Einstein was not a Cartographer, or a
Geologist. His opinion is no better than any other lay person's.

NOMINATED.

This is THE classic example of what Darwinists do with evidence and
credentials which harm their theory.

Interesting what you chose to clip and ignore in my post. Your claim
regarding Einstein's supposed support of your loony idea reflects both
fallacy of appeal to authority and it is a blatantly example of quote
mining. You continue this sort of distortion yourself by ignoring a
number of issues not in your favor to further this distortion of
yours.

Evolution is pure fraud and the
nobody who wrote the above attack on Einstein tells us that ordinary
evolutionists are the Fundies on the other side of the street.

That's because it isn't! Evolution, unlike the fairy tale that you're
pushing here, is based on an abundance of empirical evidence that you
must ignore in order to protect your own cherished myth.

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA118.html

Einstein provided information about the Earth relevant to his
expertise and to even suggest his expertise suddenly ends at a certain
point confirms everything we already know about the morons who
populate Evolution.

There are a number of issues regarding this latest quote mine of
yours:

1) Einstein was not explicitly endorsing Hapgood's theory
about Antarctica and the Piri Reis map.
2) Einstein's conclusion, which was conveniently clipped from
your own version of the quote, actually supported the concept
of a polar landmass going in the complete opposite direction than
Hapsgood was suggesting and his interpretation of the map (and
yours) called for.
3) The subject is still one of geology and not theoretical physics.
4) The whole subject of plate tectonics was, at best, in its infancy
at the time of the quote in question.
5) There is now plenty of evidence that supports Antarctica being
right where it is during the last several millennia.
6) There is plenty of evidence indicating that the Piri Reis map was
nowhere near as accurate as you and it's proponents are making it
out to be.

Ordinary evolutionists are wholly subjective; ignorant; and have no
clue as to how facts are established. This explains why they think
evidence exists outside of the endorsement of a recognized scholar.

A recognized scholar for which you pick and choose what to quote from
him and what to conveniently ignore and then you grossly distort what
he actually said about the one thing you falsely claim that he agreed
with your position. That's hardly honest of you now, is it?

The evidence presented exposes the evos of this Group to be dishonest
and brazen about it.

You're projecting again Ray. Why can't you be the exception for
Creationists and actually admit when you're wrong?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Has he published it yet?
    ... Einstein endorsed the validity of these maps and the scholarship which ... Geological evidence confirms that the latest date Queen Maud Land ... Stone age humans were just as intelligent as modern humans. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Comments to the Danish Study of the Vinland Map
    ... has undergone restoration at least twice. ... above quote 1: "Moreover, FT-Raman analysis of the areas of VM parchment not ... In the third paragraph page 12 the report states that VM been restored by ... this seems to have been the second time the map was restored. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Will I go to Hell for this?
    ... This quote was a direct reference to how Einstein felt about how ... It's obvious from this quote how the word "religion" was ... While we're on the subject about misinformation and distortion: ...
    (rec.music.classical.guitar)
  • Re: A little challenge for relativists.
    ... >>> evidence if it existed so you can be assured that there was none. ... >>> first evidence which was claimed to support source independence was ... This is perhaps what set Einstein apart, ... >>> and that the constant c was the speed relative to the ether. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Alaska on Ancient maps
    ... > Mercator/Janssonius 1648 map. ... You have no evidence of that, Inger. ... from someone having recognized credentials and in doing so, and in doing so, ...
    (sci.archaeology)