Re: Has he published it yet?


"Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1173143883.847703.310630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 5, 3:19 pm, Jon Fleming <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:59:40 GMT, Ye Old One <use...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The most
puzzling however is not so much how Piri Reis managed to draw such an
accurate map of the Antarctic region 300 years before it was
discovered, but that the map shows the coastline under the ice.

No it does not.


Answers like this is why we know evolution and its peddlers are false.

How do we "know" that, Ray?

The Darwinist, when confronted with evidence which has no place in
their theory, simply deny that it exists.

You mean like you deny the fossil KNM WT 15000?


The site and its information says exactly what your reply of great
"substance" denies.

What makes you think the "site" and it's "information" are correct?

The Reis map has been corroborated to correspond
to the coastline under the ice cap.

Corraborated by whom?

I urge all to read the web page
and come back and read the yellow answers by "evidence-driven
Darwinists."

Ray, are you aware that there are other possible explanations than the
claims made in that website?



Of course, loons like Ray don't pause to think ... if Antarctica were
freed of ice, the continent would look very different than that which
we measure under the ice today, because removing the weight of the ice
would lead to the land underneath rebounding.up.


This comment seeks to protect a groundless conventional view which is
falsified by the Reis map and its ancient source maps.

How would the conventional views be falsified, even if the "map" was
genuine?

Antarctica did
not have an ice cap in the 16th century.

Yes, it did, Ray. It's had an ice cap for millions of years.

The Reis map proves it.

Unless the Reis map wasn't an accurate drawing of the coastline. There is
some good evidence that it's not.

The
map is endorsed by many credentialed persons including Einstein.

as has been pointed out already, Einstein was not a Cartographer, or a
Geologist. His opinion is no better than any other lay person's.


Your insult indicates rage caused by the evidence and your inability
to provide a better explanation.

Ray, you claims are very easy to refute, therefore there is no "inabilty to
refute", and no "rage" except your own.


The larger picture remains intact (Biblical scenario of mankind
beginning intelligent),

The Bible doesn't say that "mankind" began intelligent. Nor is there any
evidence that ancient people were more intelligent than modern people....

which is the real reason for your dismissal of
evidence by unsupported assertion and invective.

The "map" does not support your particular interpetation of the Bible. It
is, at best, a 16th century map, copied from other contemporary sources.
There is no evidence that it was derived from ANY ancient maps, much less
any maps from 4000 BC. Quite possilbly it's a modern forgery.


Darwinists are not loyal to evidence; but are in the business of
suppressing or poisoning all evidence which falsifies their atheist
creation myth.

Evolution is a scientific theory, not an "atheist" anything. Nothing in
these maps falsifies, or even casts doubt on the theory of evolution. Try
again, Ray.

I could produce endless amounts of evidence showing the
Bible correct about human origins but it will all be met with this
type of post by Darwinist Jon Fleming.

Ray, if you could produce this evidence, why haven't you? You have never
produced any evidence that the Bible's creation stories are literally
accurate, and you have been presented with much evidence they are not. Why
do you persist in this fiction?


You guys could care less about truth; atheist loonacy is your
singleminded reverse Fundamentalist obsession.

Ray, the fact remains your assertions are not backed by any real evidence.
Wild assertions and oddball claims are not "evidence". You are the one
who has no use for the truth, as it clearly refutes your beliefs.

DJT


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Has he published it yet?
    ... but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. ... really nothing like that of Antarctica. ... Your insult indicates rage caused by the evidence and your inability ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Has he published it yet?
    ... but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. ... The Reis map has been corroborated to correspond ... Your insult indicates rage caused by the evidence and your inability ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Has he published it yet?
    ... but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. ... The Reis map has been corroborated to correspond ... Your insult indicates rage caused by the evidence and your inability ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: Has he published it yet?
    ... but that the map shows the coastline under the ice. ... really nothing like that of Antarctica. ... Your insult indicates rage caused by the evidence and your inability ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Alaska on Ancient maps
    ... > Mercator/Janssonius 1648 map. ... You have no evidence of that, Inger. ... from someone having recognized credentials and in doing so, and in doing so, ...
    (sci.archaeology)