Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- From: r norman <r_s_norman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:11:39 -0700
On 5 Mar 2007 12:09:35 -0800, "hersheyh" <hersheyhv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 5, 12:35 pm, "derdag" <der...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<snip>
On Mar 5, 5:46 am, "SJAB1958" <balf...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can anyone help me out with a query? I know that the swapping of
genetic material between organisms arose before the formation of
separate genders, but did separate genders come before hermaphrodites
or was it the other way round? Any website links that would help here
would be greatly appreciated.
When evolution decided
"Evolution" does not 'decide' anything. That would be ignorant
anthorpomorphism. Unlike our dear Prez, evolution is not the
'decider' of anything. Local environmental conditions, OTOH, are the
the dumb, unintelligent decider between variants based on how well
those variants reproduce.
When normal people say that evolution "decides" or "chooses", it is
simple anthropomorhic shorthand, a common practice among the
cognoscenti. When derdag says it, it is plain ignorance, not
specifically anthropomorphic ignorance.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- From: Perplexed in Peoria
- Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- References:
- Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- From: SJAB1958
- Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- From: derdag
- Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- From: hersheyh
- Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- Prev by Date: Re: ClownHall columnist: Atheistic Democracy: An oxymoron
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Commentary: Judge Jones' god of the gaps fallacy
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution of Separate Genders in Animals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|