Re: 2007, but no homosexual gene, protein, hormone, enzyme or evidence.

On Mar 3, 2:14 pm, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <1172944436.024732.25...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

"derdag" <der...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some people don't consider annocdotal evidence to be very strong, but
they have had 60 years to move from annocdotal evidence to something
more concrete.

Ah. A new definition of "anecdotal evidence": consistent findings by
social workers and psychologists which one finds disagreeable.

It isn't my desire that they do it,

Ah, you won't actually care what genetic evidence is ever uncovered.
You'll still hate gay people.

but rather a
'requirement' if they present a hereditary argument/excuse.

What do I need an excuse for?

I don't care what they do, but they also wish to use their reasoning
to gain social policy changes

What's wrong with social policy changes? Would you prefer that the US be
a colony of the British Crown, with slavery abolished, taxes on paper,
trials in absentia, no democracy, and state-sanctioned religion?

and government special favoritisms.

What "favoritisms"?

Homophobes keep telling me about all these government grants and
programs and special statuses, but nobody will tell me what they are or
how to sign up or them.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>http://www.timberwoof.com
Level 1 Linux technical support: Read The Fscking Manual!
Level 2 Linux technical support: Write The Fscking Code Yourself!

Do homosexuals fit within minority status and qualify for affirmative
action gimme gimme? You know all about it. White guys with brains
qualifying for affirmative action gimme, set aside for less
intelligent types. It is a scam!

.

Relevant Pages