talk.origins

• Date Index

---

• The Evolutionary History of Mammals, Jeffrey Turner
• The Genetic Hodge Podge of Marmosets, Jeffrey Turner
• Creation and Evolution, Armin Held
• Ancestor More Ape-like?, Apobetics
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Kermit
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, TomS
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Pip R. Lagenta
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Cemtech
    • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Cemtech
      • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Ancestor More Ape-like?, Cory Albrecht
• Old folks dating, barbara.girl
  • Re: Old folks dating, Cheezits
  • Re: Old folks dating, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Old folks dating, Cheezits
  • Re: Old folks dating, Kermit
  • Re: Old folks dating, Inez
    • Re: Old folks dating, r norman
  • Re: Old folks dating, Cemtech
  • Re: Old folks dating, Dan Luke
• Ray Martinez: Carpe Diem!, Rolf
  • Re: Ray Martinez: Carpe Diem!, Cemtech
• Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, Ron O
    • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, Frank J
    • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, llpens@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, Tony Raymonds
  • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, Desertphile
    • Re: Interview: Jay Richards Elaborates on the Controversy Over Intelligent Design, llpens@xxxxxxx
• new book by creationist reviewed at 'first things', wf3h
  • Re: new book by creationist reviewed at 'first things', 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: new book by creationist reviewed at 'first things', Desertphile
  • Re: new book by creationist reviewed at 'first things', Desertphile
• Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
  • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, Martin Andersen
    • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
    • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, dkomo
      • Re: Dolphins ;.o\, sharon
• Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, Craig T
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, DougC
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, richardalanforrest
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, Cheezits
  • Re: Timothy Birdnow gets all sciencey n' such, Desertphile
• Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Inez
  • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Dan Luke
    • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., John Wilkins
  • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Daniel Jackson
    • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Inez
      • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., Don Cates
  • Re: Disproving the notion of an Intelligent Designer., barbara.girl
• 545 articles is enough, JTEM
  • Re: 545 articles is enough, Jerry Sparks
    • Re: 545 articles is enough, Ernest Major
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, Kermit
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, richardalanforrest
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, shipmodeler1
  • Re: 545 articles is enough, Baron Bodissey
  • Re: 545 articles is enough, Ken Shackleton
    • Re: 545 articles is enough, JTEM
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, Ken Shackleton
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, Ken Shackleton
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, JTEM
      • Re: 545 articles is enough, Ken Shackleton
• Intelligent design as a science, frozennomad
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Jerry Sparks
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Mike Dworetsky
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Earle Jones
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, John Wilkins
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, RAM
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Cemtech
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Ray Martinez
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Earle Jones
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Ray Martinez
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Dana Tweedy
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, wf3h
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, RAM
      • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Desertphile
    • Chez Watt! Was: Intelligent design as a science, Augray
      • Re: Chez Watt! Was: Intelligent design as a science, shipmodeler1
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Dana Tweedy
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Joe Cummings
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Joe Cummings
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Joe Cummings
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Desertphile
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Steve Marshall
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Ray Martinez
    • Re: Intelligent design as a science, wf3h
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Steve Marshall
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Lee
  • Re: Intelligent design as a science, Desertphile
• Where is Mcnameless?, Wombat
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, SeppoP
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Ye Old One
    • Message not available
      • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Rolf
    • Message not available
      • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Greg G.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, John Wilkins
    • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Walter Bushell
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Chris H
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Dan Luke
    • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Dave Fritzinger
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, Desertphile
  • Re: Where is Mcnameless?, mccoy
• Online Resource From PBS, Ian Chua
• The Difference, Apobetics
  • Re: The Difference, Server 13
    • Re: The Difference, raven1
  • Re: The Difference, Ernest Major
  • Re: The Difference, crownofpapermache
    • Re: The Difference, Tiktaalik
    • Re: The Difference, Tiktaalik
  • Re: The Difference, Kermit
    • Re: The Difference, Will in New Haven
      • Re: The Difference, Ferrous Patella
      • Re: The Difference, Greg G.
      • Re: The Difference, Kermit
    • Re: The Difference, J.J. O'Shea
  • Re: The Difference, Will in New Haven
  • Re: The Difference, Scooter the Mighty
    • Re: The Difference, Inez
    • Re: The Difference, Frank L
  • Re: The Difference, Pip R. Lagenta
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Difference, Pip R. Lagenta
      • Re: The Difference, Cemtech
  • Re: The Difference, Ye Old One
  • Re: The Difference, skyeyes
  • Re: The Difference, Tiny Bulcher
    • Re: The Difference, Pip R. Lagenta
  • Re: The Difference, CreateThis
  • Re: The Difference, Steve Marshall
  • Re: The Difference, wf3h
  • Re: The Difference, Rolf
    • Re: The Difference, Cemtech
      • Re: The Difference, gregwrld
      • Re: The Difference, Cemtech
      • Re: The Difference, Tiny Bulcher
• News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Ye Old One
  • Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Shane
    • Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Kermit
    • Re: Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Ye Old One
      • Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Tiktaalik
    • Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: News: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Tim Norfolk
  • Re: London Zoo opens new gorilla enclosure., Mike Dworetsky
• News: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Ye Old One
  • Re: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Mike Dworetsky
    • Re: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Jeffrey Turner
      • Re: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Cory Albrecht
  • Re: News: Worlds with Double Sunsets Common., Desertphile
• science about free will, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: science about free will, CreateThis
    • Re: science about free will, Tiny Bulcher
  • Re: science about free will, fropome
  • Re: science about free will, Vend
    • Re: science about free will, Dogma Discharge
    • Re: science about free will, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: science about free will, Kermit
      • Re: science about free will, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: science about free will, Craig Franck
      • Re: science about free will, Guido
      • Re: science about free will, Vend
    • Re: science about free will, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: science about free will, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: science about free will, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: science about free will, bullpup
      • Re: science about free will, Desertphile
  • Re: science about free will, goodbyeblueskye@xxxxxxxx
    • Re: science about free will, Ymir
  • Re: science about free will, Ye Old One
  • Re: science about free will, Desertphile
• In the News: Museum a marvel of creationism, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Museum a marvel of creationism, Ron O
    • Re: In the News: Museum a marvel of creationism, Server 13
    • Re: In the News: Museum a marvel of creationism, Walter Bushell
  • Re: In the News: Museum a marvel of creationism, Walter Bushell
• Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Ron O
    • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, MitchAlsup
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Googler
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Earle Jones
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Earle Jones
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Desertphile
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, Jeffrey Turner
    • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, Earle Jones
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, dali_70
      • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, Desertphile
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with, Chris H
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Earle Jones
  • Re: Commentary: Creationism Advocate Vents His Frustration with Federal, State Officials, Desertphile
• Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, indriko
  • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Klaus
    • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Mark VandeWettering
      • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Dana Tweedy
  • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Augray
  • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Tracy P. Hamilton
    • Re: Archaeopteryx - creationist museum, Cemtech
• heck, I had no idea . . ., 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., coaster
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Kevin Wayne Williams
    • Re: Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Ye Old One
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Robert Carnegie
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Chris
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., catshark
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Josh Hayes
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Ymir
  • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Robert Grumbine
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Ernest Major
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., Robert Grumbine
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., David Canzi -- non-mailable
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., John Wilkins
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., TomS
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., John Wilkins
      • Re: heck, I had no idea . . ., 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
• testing, Dale Kelly
  • Re: testing, CreateThis
    • Re: testing, John Wilkins
      • Re: testing, CreateThis
      • Re: testing, Cemtech
  • Re: testing, Bob Casanova
• Re: Hello. I am lying., Frank J
  • Re: Hello. I am lying., CreateThis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hello. I am lying., Desertphile
  • Re: Hello. I am lying., Bob Casanova
    • Re: Hello. I am lying., richardalanforrest
• McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Ferrous Patella
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, snex
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Ferrous Patella
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, CreateThis
    • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Frank J
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Frank J
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, hbarwood
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Josh Hayes
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, AC
    • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Desertphile
  • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: McCook Community College offering Creation Science class, Frank J
• Evolutionism Religion, Apobetics
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, edward_eck
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, richardalanforrest
    • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Blazing . Laser
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Ernest Major
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Conspiracy of Doves
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Joe Cummings
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Ye Old One
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Pip R. Lagenta
  • Religionism Religion, Scooter the Mighty
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Kermit
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Elf M. Sternberg
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Inez
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, moxmaniac
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Cemtech
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Frank J
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, CreateThis
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Cheezits
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, Earle Jones
  • Re: Evolutionism Religion, wf3h
• Re: Wibble Wibble is the meaning of life, actingnewseditor
• Facts about evolution and other messages about natural mechanics, actingnewseditor
  • Re: Facts about evolution and other messages about natural mechanics, Timberwoof
    • Re: Facts about evolution and other messages about natural mechanics, actingnewseditor@xxxxxxxxx
• Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
  • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, roger_pearse
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, John McKendry
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, roger_pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, wf3h
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, snex
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, John Wilkins
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Roger Pearse
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, CortxVortx
  • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Blazing . Laser
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Blazing . Laser
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Blazing . Laser
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Blazing . Laser
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Cheezits
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Blazing . Laser
  • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, CreateThis
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, CreateThis
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Rolf
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, CreateThis
  • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Fundamentalism, Christendom or Science?, Desertphile
• [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Rolf
  • Re: Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Mr tiktaalik
    • Re: Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Kermit
      • Re: Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Server 13
      • Re: Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Ernest Major
  • Re: [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Timberwoof
      • Re: [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, Rolf
  • Re: [OT] Thoriom powered nuclear energy projected for 2017, dkomo
• Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, richardalanforrest
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, AC
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cemtech
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cemtech
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Stuart
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Josh Hayes
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, JohnN
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, richardalanforrest
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, TomS
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Jon Fleming
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ilas
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Mike Dworetsky
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, wf3h
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Stuart
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, rmcbane
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, CreateThis
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, CreateThis
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, wf3h
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, wf3h
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ron O
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ilas
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cheezits
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ilas
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ilas
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, SeppoP
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ilas
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ye Old One
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ye Old One
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ye Old One
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Desertphile
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, AC
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cheezits
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cheezits
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Kevin Wayne Williams
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Mike Dworetsky
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Cheezits
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Mark VandeWettering
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, wf3h
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Earle Jones
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Krubozumo Nyankoye
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Mike Dworetsky
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
      • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Stuart
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, ngc2099
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, ngc2099
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, TomS
  • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ernest Major
    • Re: Teaching Evolution In Schools, Ian Chua
• In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, richardalanforrest
    • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Jerry Sparks
    • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Faux_Pseudo
    • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, John Wilkins
  • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Desertphile
    • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Jim Lovejoy
      • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, Desertphile
  • Re: In the News: Veering from Evolution: Fired teacher explains his presentation, coaster
• Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Ian Chua
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Friar Broccoli
    • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Sonofagunzel
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Ernest Major
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, TomS
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, CreateThis
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Mark VandeWettering
    • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Sasha
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, CreateThis
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Ian Chua
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Jim Lovejoy
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, wf3h
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, coaster
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, Bodega
  • Re: Rigorous Evidence For Evolution, ABarlow
• Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Danny the Burgundy
    • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, The Pooflinger
  • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, The Last Conformist
  • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Vend
    • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Ken Denny
    • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, snex
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Pip R. Lagenta
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, snex
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Pip R. Lagenta
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, WuzYoungOnceToo
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Jim Lovejoy
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Cemtech
    • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, John Wilkins
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Vend
  • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
    • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
      • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Martin Hutton
  • Re: Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Peanut Butter: Disproving Evolution, One Sandwich At A Time, Desertphile
• Sam Harris debates Dennis Prager, Jason Spaceman
• Re: Hey ID'ers & Creationists! - Read It And Weep!, Perplexed in Peoria
• Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, George
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Mike Dworetsky
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, eroot
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Bodega
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, eroot
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Desertphile
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, JohnN
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Desertphile
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, richardalanforrest
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Ron O
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Robert Carnegie
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, J.J. O'Shea
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Harry K
    • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Harry K
  • Re: Commentary: Creationists drop religion for intelligence, Dr.GH
• natural to assume..., odin
  • Re: natural to assume..., snex
    • Re: natural to assume..., John Wilkins
      • Re: natural to assume..., George
      • Re: natural to assume..., snex
      • Re: natural to assume..., George
      • Re: natural to assume..., catshark
      • Re: natural to assume..., Robert Carnegie
  • Re: natural to assume..., Just Me
  • Re: natural to assume..., Blazing . Laser
  • Re: natural to assume..., Ye Old One
  • Re: natural to assume..., edward_eck
• [NYT] Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, maximum maypo
  • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, snex
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, snex
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, snex
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, The Enigmatic One
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Dustan
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, snex
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, snex
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, hersheyh
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Dick C
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, hersheyh
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Jim
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Martin Kaletsch
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, The Enigmatic One
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, hersheyh
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Lorentz
      • Re: Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Ye Old One
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Klaus
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, The Enigmatic One
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, hersheyh
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdag
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, eroot
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, wf3h
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Lorentz
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, hersheyh
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Lorentz
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Shane
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Desertphile
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Lorentz
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, edward_eck
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Desertphile
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, lhcarter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Desertphile
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Cory Albrecht
  • Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, j
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, derdagian1
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, gregwrld
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Martin Kaletsch
      • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, AC
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Ernest Major
  • Re: [NYT] Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Ye Old One
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Nickhotep
  • Re: [NYT] Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Ernest Major
    • Re: [NYT] Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Lorentz
  • Re: Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Ron O
  • Re: [NYT] Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals, Desertphile
• Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, noone
  • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, 'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
  • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Cemtech
  • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Ron O
      • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Desertphile
  • Re: Egnor blows the lid off the Darwinian psyche, Bodega
• Surprised by FOX News, Kevin Wayne Williams
  • Re: Surprised by FOX News, John Wilkins
    • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Ernest Major
  • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Occidental
    • Re: Surprised by FOX News, backspace
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Kevin Wayne Williams
  • Re: Surprised by FOX News, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Surprised by FOX News, John Wilkins
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Josh Hayes
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Desertphile
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Walter Bushell
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Desertphile
    • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Kid Cool
      • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Josh Hayes
  • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Desertphile
    • Re: Surprised by FOX News, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Surprised by FOX News, Dr.GH
• Evolutionism is Science?, Apobetics
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, snex
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, DJT
    • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Jim
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Ernest Major
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Ye Old One
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Pip R. Lagenta
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Cheezits
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Kermit
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Frank J
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, raven1
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, wf3h
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, CreateThis
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Steve Marshall
    • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, AnotherPoster
      • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Cemtech
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Bodega
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Iain
    • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Steve Marshall
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, The Enigmatic One
  • Message not available
    • POTM: Re: Evolutionism is Science?, catshark
  • Re: Evolutionism is Science?, Desertphile
• In the news: The trouble with scientific debates, Giant Sloth
• Direction of View, Apobetics
  • Re: Direction of View, Robert Weldon
    • Re: Direction of View, Inez
    • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
  • Re: Direction of View, Will in New Haven
    • Re: Direction of View, Richard Clayton
    • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
      • Message not available
      • Re: Direction of View, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Direction of View, Server 13
  • Re: Direction of View, Rolf
  • Re: Direction of View, Ye Old One
  • Re: Direction of View, Lee
  • Re: Direction of View, CreateThis
    • Re: Direction of View, Ernest Major
  • Re: Direction of View, Pip R. Lagenta
    • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
  • Re: Direction of View, Frank J
  • Re: Direction of View, wf3h
  • Re: Direction of View, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Direction of View, Lexington Victoria-Rice
  • Re: Direction of View, Martin Kaletsch
  • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
  • Re: Direction of View, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Direction of View, Desertphile
      • Re: Direction of View, John Wilkins
      • Re: Direction of View, Tiny Bulcher
• Isochron dating *g*, Thurisaz the Einherjer
  • Re: Isochron dating *g*, Desertphile
• Hope for Evolutionists, Johnny Freedom
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Rolf
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, coaster
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Ron O
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, noctiluca
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, SJAB1958
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Greg G.
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, SJAB1958
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Greg G.
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Jim Lovejoy
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, John Wilkins
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Cemtech
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, SJAB1958
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, noctiluca
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Desertphile
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, noctiluca
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Harry K
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Cemtech
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Richard Smol
    • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Pete G.
      • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Pip R. Lagenta
  • Re: Hope for Evolutionists, Desertphile
• Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Terry
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., DJT
    • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., neutralino
      • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Dana Tweedy
    • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., username_not_found
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Glenn
    • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., richardalanforrest
      • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Glenn
      • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Lee Oswald Ving
      • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Nic
    • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Lorentz
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Cemtech
  • Re: Dinosaur Dung. You can get anything on Ebay., Bodega
• God The Father on 6-14-06, wenddis
  • Re: God The Father on 6-14-06, Inez
  • Re: God The Father on 6-14-06, Robert Weldon
  • Re: God The Father on 6-14-06, Bodega
  • Re: God The Father on 6-14-06, Desertphile
• Somethings Never Change, Jeffrey Turner
• another day, another creationist distortion, edward_eck
  • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Gannet on a Stick
  • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Ray Martinez
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Harvest Dancer
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, snex
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, DJT
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Chuck
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Shane
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, wf3h
    • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Desertphile
  • Re: another day, another creationist distortion, Desertphile
• Stone Age Chimps, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: Stone Age Chimps, John Vreeland
• Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Kari Tikkanen
  • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Kari Tikkanen
    • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Craig T
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Cemtech
  • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, John Vreeland
    • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Mark Iredell
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Ernest Major
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Ernest Major
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, John Wilkins
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Mark Iredell
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Mark Iredell
      • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Policy asked to investigate entropy-claim in website of Turku University in Finland, Desertphile
• Earn Quick Cash with only $5.00, Wealth
  • Re: Earn Quick Cash with only $5.00, David Canzi -- non-mailable
  • Re: Earn Quick Cash with only $5.00, Desertphile
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Earn Quick Cash with only $5.00, Wealth
  • Re: Earn Quick Cash with only $5.00, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: test, SJAB1958
• Chez Watt (Re: MAKE MONEY WISELY etc), Don Cates
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Chez Watt (Re: MAKE MONEY WISELY etc), Don Cates
• Jerry Coyne and Paul Nelson on TV Ontario tonight, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: Jerry Coyne and Paul Nelson on TV Ontario tonight, Jason Spaceman
• In the News: Debunking Darwin, Jason Spaceman
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, snex
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Pete G.
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, snex
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Lexington Victoria-Rice
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, _Arthur
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, _Arthur
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, John Wilkins
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Cory Albrecht
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Robert Grumbine
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Desertphile
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, John Harshman
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Dan Luke
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, hersheyh
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Pete G.
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Bodega
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, catshark
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, DJT
      • Chez Watt Nomination (Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin), Desertphile
    • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, alwaysaskingquestions
  • Re: In the News: Debunking Darwin, Desertphile
• Please, kill me kill me now!, Desertphile
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Radix2
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Greg G.
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Friar Broccoli
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, derdag
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Ozan Türkyılmaz
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, John Wilkins
  • Message not available
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, chris.linthompson@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., T Pagano
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., snex
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., The Last Conformist
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., TomS
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Wakboth
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., JohnN
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Dick
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., snex
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Walter Bushell
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Ernest Major
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Walter Bushell
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., John Stockwell
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Greg G.
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., wf3h
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Cemtech
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Dick
      • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Cemtech
    • Re: Desertphile's uses the tired and false argument from imperfection., Desertphile
    • Re: Pagano Tired of Not Being Able To Deal With..., Lee Oswald Ving
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, John Vreeland
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, rmj
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Friar Broccoli
      • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Timberwoof
      • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Friar Broccoli
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Desertphile
  • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Dick
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Lorentz
    • Re: Please, kill me kill me now!, Desertphile
• Design detection challenge # n+1, Bobby Bryant
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Augray
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Klaus
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, JohnN
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Vend
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, The Last Conformist
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Nic
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Nic
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Nic
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Desertphile
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, John Wilkins
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Desertphile
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, J.J. O'Shea
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, eroot
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, John Wilkins
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Desertphile
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Robert Grumbine
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, edward_eck
  • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, T Pagano
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Bobby Bryant
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, richardalanforrest
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, eroot
    • Re: Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Ye Old One
      • Re: Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Josh Hayes
      • Stop the Presses! Pagano Right about Something!, Jim Lovejoy
    • add probstat to the list of things pagano doesnt understand, snex
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Dan Luke
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, RAM
      • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, RAM
    • Re: How can Bryant offer a challenge for a topic over which he is completely ignorant?, Earle Jones
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, derdag
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, snex
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Cory Albrecht
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Augray
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, John Wilkins
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Augray
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, edward_eck
      • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Glenn
    • Re: Design detection challenge # n+1, Bobby Bryant
• David Mills Interview: Friday, March 30 at 9 pm EST, DavidMills.Net
• Re: Human evolution "radically" reappraised, Perplexed in Peoria
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Human evolution "radically" reappraised, Ron O
    • Re: Human evolution "radically" reappraised, Pete G.
• UFOs, nhamber06
  • Re: UFOs, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: UFOs, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: UFOs, CreateThis
  • Re: UFOs, Cemtech
    • Re: UFOs, Tom McDonald
      • Re: UFOs, Cemtech
      • Re: UFOs, Desertphile
    • Re: UFOs, Cemtech
    • Re: UFOs, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: UFOs, Cemtech
      • Re: UFOs, Robert Carnegie
  • Re: UFOs, Denis Loubet
    • Re: UFOs, Cory Albrecht
  • Re: UFOs, Bodega
• intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, snex
  • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, louann_m@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Perplexed in Peoria
      • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, John Harshman
      • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Pete G.
  • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Frank J
  • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Cemtech
    • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Cory Albrecht
      • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Desertphile
    • Re: intelligent designer identified, lives on saturn!, Desertphile
• Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Lorentz
  • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, WuzYoungOnceToo
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Frank J
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Perplexed in Peoria
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, John Wilkins
  • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, John Harshman
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Will in New Haven
      • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Perplexed in Peoria
  • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Mark VandeWettering
  • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, The Last Conformist
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Robert Carnegie
      • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Lorentz
    • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Bobby Bryant
      • Re: Paradign: Karl Popper is a moron, Tom McDonald
• Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Darwinism 101, John Harshman
    • Re: Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Darwinism 101, John Harshman
      • Re: Darwinism 101, Bob Casanova
      • Re: Darwinism 101, AC
      • Re: Darwinism 101, J.J. O'Shea
      • Re: Darwinism 101, richardalanforrest
  • Re: Darwinism 101, Vend
  • Re: Darwinism 101, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Darwinism 101, Cemtech
    • Re: Darwinism 101, Desertphile
      • Re: Darwinism 101, Cemtech
      • Re: Darwinism 101, Bob Casanova
  • Re: Darwinism 101, CreateThis
  • Re: Darwinism 101, Rolf Aalberg
    • Re: Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Darwinism 101, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Darwinism 101, snex
      • Re: Darwinism 101, wf3h
      • Re: Darwinism 101, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Darwinism 101, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Darwinism 101, nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Darwinism 101, richardalanforrest
      • Re: Re: Darwinism 101, Ye Old One
      • Re: Darwinism 101, John Wilkins
      • Re: Re: Darwinism 101, Ye Old One
      • Re: Darwinism 101, John Wilkins
      • Re: Darwinism 101, wf3h
      • Re: Darwinism 101, Vend
      • Re: Darwinism 101, Vend
      • Re: Re: Darwinism 101, Ye Old One
      • Re: Darwinism 101, wf3h
      • Re: Da